How Is Darwin’s Idea Dangerous? John West Counts the Ways
It amazes me that people who are otherwise smart and sensitive can
treat the impact of Darwinism on our culture as an afterthought, if
that. One of the best book titles on evolution is atheist Daniel C.
Dennett’s 1995 book, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Of course Dennett meant that evolution was dangerous in good
ways as he sees it, “eat[ing] through just about every traditional
concept, and leav[ing] in its wake a revolutionized world-view, with
most of the old landmarks still recognizable, but transformed in
fundamental ways.”
You could hardly put it better. In an excellent new print and podcast interview with World
Magazine, Discovery Institute vice president John West details the
landscape of the cultural, moral, legal, even medical “landmarks” that
have been worn away under the influence of evolutionary thinking.
First and foremost, the impact has been on faith: “Darwin’s theory
wasn’t just about change over time — it was that we’re part of an
accidental process.” How could this not have a corrosive affect?
West also discusses the sexual revolution, racism, reductionism of the
human being to a meat machine, and more. The last point brings an
observation, deserving of more attention, about the rush to medicate
young people. A purely material process of origins naturally means a
purely material person as its product:
Psychoactive drugs are a great benefit to society — I’ve had family members who have benefited from them. But I think it should concern people that in some schools in America, 40 percent or more of the young boys are put on Ritalin for ADHD. Ritalin is pharmacologically related to cocaine, so it is going to affect your concentration whether you have ADHD or not. This idea that we’re just these material creatures leads to a psychoactive-drug-first mentality.
Advice for Parents
And Dr. West adds other helpful counsel for parents, who should be
proactive in how they allow their kids to be educated. Don’t just farm
it out to the schools, whether secular or religious:
Be responsible for those in their own circles of influence. Don’t fret if you don’t have 100,000 people listening to you on YouTube or Facebook. Pay attention to your own kids. Pay attention to the kids of your friends. Even in evangelical churches, parents often farm out the raising of their kids. You can’t cede your parenting to schools — public or Christian. And you certainly can’t cede it to the internet, social media, or video games. If you feel ill-equipped, there’s good news: Various groups have produced lots of great resources to help you talk about these things with your kids. You don’t need to be an expert. Just watch a video with your kids each week and engage them in discussion around the dinner table.
That is great practical advice. I would say, if parents do not take
such an active role, then religious schools may be the most risky
option. If those schools are spineless in surrendering to what the
prestige voices in the culture say, then they have given your own
faith’s imprimatur to the theory that humans arose by accident. If they
are faithful yet unsophisticated in how they teach, then your children
are in for a disturbing surprise when they get to college.
Why does it matter so much what your own family thinks about biological origins? To find out, read the rest of the interview here and listen to an excerpt here.
No comments:
Post a Comment