Sulfur Bacteria, Unchanged for Billions of Years, Confirm Darwinian Evolution. Come Again? David Klinghoffer
An organism's staying exactly the same for 2 billion years -- in other words, not evolving a bit -- supports the Darwinian theory of evolution, say scientists who studied fossils in rocks from the waters off the West Australian coast and uncovered the "greatest absence of evolution ever reported."
Nope, not The Onion. We read at Science Daily:
Given that Darwinian theory is a "fact," it must be shown that it is a "fact" regardless of evidence to the contrary. Well, given the premise, that would have to be so. The solution, please?
That was deft. It's not what they expected. But then again, it's exactly what they expected.
In summary, Darwinism is demonstrated when life evolves. It's also demonstrated when it does not. If the bacteria had changed, what would they have said? Since Darwinian evolution is a fact, you can be certain that too would be reconciled with the theory, like all evidence, one way or the other, come hell or high water.
Ps. And now for the elephant in the room: If darwinian evolution had already produced the perfect replicator and vehicle for its selfish gene at the very beginning of life's history.Shouldn't it have stop there and then as per the claims of darwinists.
An organism's staying exactly the same for 2 billion years -- in other words, not evolving a bit -- supports the Darwinian theory of evolution, say scientists who studied fossils in rocks from the waters off the West Australian coast and uncovered the "greatest absence of evolution ever reported."
Nope, not The Onion. We read at Science Daily:
Given that Darwinian theory is a "fact," it must be shown that it is a "fact" regardless of evidence to the contrary. Well, given the premise, that would have to be so. The solution, please?
That was deft. It's not what they expected. But then again, it's exactly what they expected.
In summary, Darwinism is demonstrated when life evolves. It's also demonstrated when it does not. If the bacteria had changed, what would they have said? Since Darwinian evolution is a fact, you can be certain that too would be reconciled with the theory, like all evidence, one way or the other, come hell or high water.
Ps. And now for the elephant in the room: If darwinian evolution had already produced the perfect replicator and vehicle for its selfish gene at the very beginning of life's history.Shouldn't it have stop there and then as per the claims of darwinists.
Ps. And now for the elephant in the room: If darwinian evolution had already produced the perfect replicator and vehicle for its selfish gene at the very beginning of life's history.Shouldn't it have stop there and then as per the claims of darwinists.
No comments:
Post a Comment