Atheism is doomed: the contraceptive Pill is secularism's cyanide tablet
The 1960s counterculture slogan “make love, not war” could have been invented for the Hutterites, a conservative, pacifist Anabaptist community in the US and Canada. Numbering 400 at the end of the 19th century, when they moved to Dakota on the point of extinction, there are almost 50,000 Hutterites today, despite conversion being extremely rare (they speak an archaic form of High German and live in the middle of nowhere, which makes it unlikely they’ll turn up at your doorstep with a funny grin).
They
are not alone. The Mormons continue to grow by 40 per cent every
decade, largely thanks to a high birth rate, so much so that by 2080
there will be anywhere between 63 and 267 million Mormons, depending on
whether that figure falls to 30 per cent or 50 per cent.
And
Evangelical Christians now account for two thirds of white American
Protestants, while the ultra-Orthodox account for 17 per cent of British
Jewry, but 75 per cent of children.
Across
the western world the fertility rate of religious conservatives far
outstrips that of non-believers, so much so that modern liberal
secularism is endangered. That, anyway, is the thesis of Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?, a
fascinating new book by Eric Kaufmann of Birkbeck University, which is
published later this month. It may well be one of the most significant
books of our era.
It
used to be taken for granted that, just as liberal democracy meant the
end of history, so it also meant the end of religion. Once people became
rich, educated and sexually liberated, they left irrational beliefs and
other such nonsense behind.
Christianity
declined steadily from the mid-19th century but it wasn’t until the
1960s that European societies were able to fully abandon the emotional
baggage of their civilisation’s infancy, and especially its repressive
attitude to sex.
But
if what Kaufmann is saying is true – and the demographic data suggests
it is – then the contraceptive Pill was not so much secular Europe’s
liberation as its cyanide tablet.
The
good news is that Europe will not become Islamicised (although
Kaufmann’s estimate of 20 or 25 per cent is Islamic enough). The bad
news (for some) is that it will become Evangelical Protestant instead.
This will at least be encouraging for Israel, although whether it will
be the same progressive, secular Israel where gays can serve in the
military is another matter, as by the second half of the century the
ultra-Orthodox will be the majority.
New
Atheists comfort themselves with the idea that religious people will
continue to drift their way, like rustics to the city, but the figures
do not bear this out. It is true that liberal religious people continue
to embrace atheism at a rate that alarms the Roman Catholic, Anglican
and Methodist Churches, and Reform synagogues. Once religions start to
accept secularism and rationality, their young people usually reach the
logical conclusion of doubt – unbelief.
More
conservative religions do not have that problem. Only 5 per cent of the
more traditional Amish leave the faith, and when a community’s birth
rate outstrips the national average by 200 or 300 per cent they can
easily afford to lose one in 20 of the flock.
While
the likes of Richard Dawkins aim their bile at traditional
Christianity, fundamentalists are largely immune to their attacks, and
become only stronger as the more committed members of the established
churches head their way. Those religions that survive will become more
conservative.
God
alone knows what will happen to the Church of England this century, but
we can safely say that the Catholic Church will become smaller but more
committed. It will continue to exist at the margins of an
atheist-dominated Europe ruled by an increasingly intolerant secular
Left.
Widespread
anti-religious feeling will only get more intense as the coming
demographic changes outlined by Kaufmann appear to ring true, and as
Evangelical Christians start to become more significant in, for example,
the British Conservative Party.
But
that smaller, more orthodox Catholic Church will have a huge inbuilt
advantage – what French Canadian Catholics used to call “revenge of the
cradle”. Many orthodox Catholics I know have 3 or 4 children – that’s
not a recklessly high number, but in a society where the atheist
fertility rate is around 1 child per woman, that advantage will show
over a few decades, especially since orthodox Catholics have a far
smaller drop-off rate than their liberal brethren.
Much
as this will anger the New Atheists, which is a plus, Kaufmann’s thesis
is disturbing. Personally I prefer Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, and Anglican
civilisation to some of the wackier strains of Evangelical Christianity.
As for fundamentalist Islam…
It’s
happened before: Kaufmann believes that Christianity’s rise from 40
followers to 6 million within three centuries had less to do with
conversions that with higher birth rates, since the Christians rejected
such pagan practises as polygamy and infanticide.
Today
we view the ancient world’s attitude to infanticide as barbaric and
incomprehensible, but perhaps future generations will look at our
attitudes to abortion in the same way – that's not because pro-lifers
would have won the argument, simply that (in addition to the effect of
the Pill) abortion is killing the atheists of tomorrow.
No comments:
Post a Comment