Search This Blog

Thursday 12 November 2015

Are the dead really dead?:pros.

Brother Rutherford's opening salvo of the Rutherford Troy debate.


HERE IS RUTHERFORD'S OPENING ARGUMENT.

Mr. Rutherford said:

"Mr. Chairman, I am glad to see you in such a happy mood. And that is the result of having a
happy chairman. We chose our good friend here because he has a happy vein. I hope we will all
keep up this good period of happiness and kind feeling towards each other as we progress
through this discussion.

"Preliminary to the discussion of the proposition read, it is due to you and to my opponent for
me to say that I did not seek this debate, nor did I run away from it when it came to me. I am
quite certain that my opponent did not seek it. I think some of our friends arranged it. I am not
here for the purpose of seeking notoriety or advertisement. I am not here for the purpose of
seeking money, because I do not expect to receive any. You know, we are not going to take up
any collection.

"I am not here for the purpose of getting some one to join something, because I have joined
nothing myself.

"I believe the time in man's history has been reached when the Bible is due to be understood,
and may be understood by those who seek knowledge in God's appointed way. Therefore, my
sole purpose here is to induce others to study more carefully the Bible, believing, as I do, that it
solves all the questions that are perplexing to honest-hearted men. I hope this debate may result
beneficially to those who attend. It will so result to everyone who, with open and unbiased
mind, honestly seeks the truth.

"In these four debates, I purpose, by God's grace, to point out that Jehovah has a great plan
which he is working out in an orderly way; that the Bible discloses this plan, and that the
consecrated child of God can grasp and understand it if he applies his mind and heart to the
study thereof; that this plan, when worked out, will result in great blessings to everyone of the
human race who loves right and hates wrong. In this hour of great distress and sorrow upon the
peoples and nations of the earth, God's plan, as set forth in the Bible, is the balm that will
soothe and comfort every sorrowful and penitent heart, hence the importance to all to
understand it. To aid men in reaching an understanding of his plan as set forth in the Bible, is
my desire. I have no selfish purpose to accomplish. I care not whether a man be a Catholic or
Protestant, Jew or Gentile, bond or free, if I can be of any aid to him, or turn his mind to an
investigation of these great truths, then I shall be glad.

"By reference to our agreement, it is observed that my opponent and myself have limited
ourselves to the Bible as authority upon the questions we shall here discuss. I am glad this is
true. The Bible is God-made; other authorities are man-made.

PROPOSITION.

"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and
the moment of awakening to the resurrection.

"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find:

"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious.

"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the
opposite of sleep is to be awake and

"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not
conscious.

DEFINITIONS.

"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death.

"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will
be conceded by my opponent.

"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges.

"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased
to perform their functions.

"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct
ones.

"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or
mental operations; possessing knowledge.

"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything.

"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument.PROPOSITION.

"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and
the moment of awakening to the resurrection.

"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find:

"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious.

"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the
opposite of sleep is to be awake and

"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not
conscious.

DEFINITIONS.

"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death.

"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will
be conceded by my opponent.

"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges.

"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased
to perform their functions.

"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct
ones.

"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or
mental operations; possessing knowledge.

"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything.

"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument.
 WHAT IS MAN?

"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being,
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal?

"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever,
and is always conscious.

"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal,
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception,
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'.
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings.

BIBLE ANSWER.

"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.)
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.)
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.'
(1 Corinthians 15:46.)

"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the
word 'being.'

"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely.

THE SOUL.

"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.)
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the
creature, the man.

"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust,
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.)

"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death?

"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that
thing!
 PROPOSITION.

"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and
the moment of awakening to the resurrection.

"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find:

"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious.

"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the
opposite of sleep is to be awake and

"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not
conscious.

DEFINITIONS.

"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death.

"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will
be conceded by my opponent.

"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges.

"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased
to perform their functions.

"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct
ones.

"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or
mental operations; possessing knowledge.

"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything.

"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument.
 WHAT IS MAN?

"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being,
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal?

"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever,
and is always conscious.

"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal,
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception,
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'.
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings.

BIBLE ANSWER.

"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.)
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.)
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.'
(1 Corinthians 15:46.)

"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the
word 'being.'

"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely.

THE SOUL.

"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.)
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the
creature, the man.

"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust,
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.)

"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death?

"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that
thing! PROPOSITION.

"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and
the moment of awakening to the resurrection.

"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find:

"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious.

"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the
opposite of sleep is to be awake and

"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not
conscious.

DEFINITIONS.

"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death.

"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will
be conceded by my opponent.

"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges.

"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased
to perform their functions.

"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct
ones.

"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or
mental operations; possessing knowledge.

"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything.

"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument.
 WHAT IS MAN?

"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being,
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal?

"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever,
and is always conscious.

"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal,
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception,
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'.
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings.

BIBLE ANSWER.

"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.)
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.)
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.'
(1 Corinthians 15:46.)

"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the
word 'being.'

"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely.

THE SOUL.

"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.)
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the
creature, the man.

"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust,
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.)

"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death?

"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that
thing!

PENALTY OF THE LAW.

"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4).
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?'

MAN NOT IMMORTAL.

"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.'

THE FIRST LIE.

"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked,
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age.
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully
practiced upon the people.PROPOSITION.

"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and
the moment of awakening to the resurrection.

"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find:

"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious.

"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the
opposite of sleep is to be awake and

"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not
conscious.

DEFINITIONS.

"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death.

"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will
be conceded by my opponent.

"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges.

"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased
to perform their functions.

"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct
ones.

"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or
mental operations; possessing knowledge.

"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything.

"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument.
 WHAT IS MAN?

"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being,
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal?

"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever,
and is always conscious.

"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal,
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception,
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'.
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings.

BIBLE ANSWER.

"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.)
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.)
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.'
(1 Corinthians 15:46.)

"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the
word 'being.'

"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely.

THE SOUL.

"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.)
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the
creature, the man.

"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust,
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.)

"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death?

"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that
thing!

PENALTY OF THE LAW.

"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4).
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?'

MAN NOT IMMORTAL.

"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.'

THE FIRST LIE.

"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked,
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age.
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully
practiced upon the people.

WHO IS IMMORTAL?

"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of
truth and makes this distinction.

"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.)

THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS.

"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible.

WITHOUT MEMORY.

"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?'
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10,
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious.
 PROPOSITION. 
"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and 
the moment of awakening to the resurrection. 
"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not 
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find: 
"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and 
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious. 
"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of 
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the 
opposite of sleep is to be awake and 
"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not 
conscious. 
DEFINITIONS. 
"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death. 
"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will 
be conceded by my opponent. 
"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges. 
"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased 
to perform their functions. 
"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am 
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct 
ones. 
"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or 
mental operations; possessing knowledge. 
"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of 
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything. 
"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument. 
 WHAT IS MAN? 
"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is 
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being, 
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal? 
"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and 
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like 
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and 
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever, 
and is always conscious. 
"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal, 
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A 
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception, 
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just 
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on 
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or 
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The 
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'. 
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings. 
BIBLE ANSWER. 
"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.) 
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.) 
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1 
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.' 
(1 Corinthians 15:46.) 
"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is 
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times 
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the 
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the 
word 'being.' 
"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from 
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is 
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely. 
THE SOUL. 
"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground 
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.) 
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious 
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess 
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the 
creature, the man. 
"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of 
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is 
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men 
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the 
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all 
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing 
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man 
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust, 
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.) 
"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will 
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death? 
"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man 
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that 
thing! 
PENALTY OF THE LAW. 
"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that 
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then 
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was 
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will 
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4). 
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and 
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?' 
MAN NOT IMMORTAL. 
"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and 
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that 
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has 
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear 
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still 
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture 
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.' 
THE FIRST LIE. 
"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable 
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked, 
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye 
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis 
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of 
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the 
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age. 
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should 
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan 
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no 
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the 
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully 
practiced upon the people. 
WHO IS IMMORTAL? 
"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction 
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures 
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real 
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of 
truth and makes this distinction. 
"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is 
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the 
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that 
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians 
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future 
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to 
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of 
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give 
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.) 
THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS. 
"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be 
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some 
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we 
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible. 
WITHOUT MEMORY. 
"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to 
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?' 
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall 
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10, 
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious. 
 SPEAK NOT. 
"They also cease speaking. 'The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into 
silence.' Psalms 115-17.) 
NEITHER BREATHE, THINK, FEEL. 
"They also stop breathing, thinking and feeling. 'Thou takest away their breath; they die and 
return to the dust.' (Psalms 104:29.) 'His breath goeth forth, he returneth to the earth; in that 
very day his thoughts perish.' (Psalms 146:4.) A person that cannot think and who knows 
nothing could not be conscious, neither could such an one feel. As an illustration, a man goes to 
the hospital to submit to a serious operation. Before the surgeon begins to use the knife he puts 
his patient under the influence of an anesthetic for the express purpose of producing 
unconsciousness, because he does not wish the patient to feel and thereby suffer pain of the 
operation. 
CEASES TO HATE. 
"We must keep in mind that my opponent and myself have agreed that the Bible is the authority 
by which these questions shall be settled, and mere theory and conjecture should not be 
tolerated. Then let us have some more Bible proof upon the proposition. A dead man ceases to 
love, ceases to hate and ceases to envy. (Ecclesiastes 9:6.) 
"Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly state that he 'knows not anything.' (Ecclesiastes 9:50.) The 
dead stop working; there is no more device and no more scheming. 'Whatsoever thy hand 
findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor 
wisdom, in the grave whither thou goest.' (Ecclesiastes 9:10.) 
"I submit that when a man reaches the point where he cannot remember; cannot give thanks; 
cannot speak; cannot breathe; does not think; has no feeling; neither loves, hates or envies; does 
not work; and knows not anything, he must be actually and completely dead, therefore 
unconscious. 
PERISHED. 
"To perish means to be destroyed; to be cut off; to cease to exist. -- Dr. Strong. Therefore, a 
creature that has perished cannot be conscious anywhere. Does man perish when he dies? Let 
the Scriptures answer. 'For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person 
perish, and leave their wealth to others. Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue 
forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. 
Nevertheless, man being in honor abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.' (Psalms 
49:10,12.)
 PROPOSITION. 
"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and 
the moment of awakening to the resurrection. 
"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not 
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find: 
"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and 
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious. 
"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of 
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the 
opposite of sleep is to be awake and 
"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not 
conscious. 
DEFINITIONS. 
"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death. 
"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will 
be conceded by my opponent. 
"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges. 
"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased 
to perform their functions. 
"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am 
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct 
ones. 
"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or 
mental operations; possessing knowledge. 
"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of 
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything. 
"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument. 
 WHAT IS MAN? 
"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is 
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being, 
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal? 
"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and 
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like 
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and 
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever, 
and is always conscious. 
"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal, 
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A 
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception, 
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just 
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on 
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or 
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The 
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'. 
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings. 
BIBLE ANSWER. 
"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.) 
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.) 
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1 
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.' 
(1 Corinthians 15:46.) 
"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is 
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times 
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the 
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the 
word 'being.' 
"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from 
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is 
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely. 
THE SOUL. 
"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground 
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.) 
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious 
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess 
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the 
creature, the man. 
"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of 
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is 
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men 
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the 
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all 
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing 
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man 
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust, 
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.) 
"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will 
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death? 
"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man 
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that 
thing! 
PENALTY OF THE LAW. 
"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that 
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then 
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was 
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will 
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4). 
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and 
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?' 
MAN NOT IMMORTAL. 
"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and 
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that 
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has 
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear 
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still 
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture 
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.' 
THE FIRST LIE. 
"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable 
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked, 
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye 
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis 
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of 
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the 
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age. 
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should 
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan 
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no 
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the 
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully 
practiced upon the people. 
WHO IS IMMORTAL? 
"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction 
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures 
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real 
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of 
truth and makes this distinction. 
"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is 
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the 
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that 
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians 
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future 
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to 
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of 
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give 
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.) 
THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS. 
"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be 
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some 
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we 
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible. 
WITHOUT MEMORY. 
"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to 
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?' 
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall 
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10, 
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious. 
 SPEAK NOT. 
"They also cease speaking. 'The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into 
silence.' Psalms 115-17.) 
NEITHER BREATHE, THINK, FEEL. 
"They also stop breathing, thinking and feeling. 'Thou takest away their breath; they die and 
return to the dust.' (Psalms 104:29.) 'His breath goeth forth, he returneth to the earth; in that 
very day his thoughts perish.' (Psalms 146:4.) A person that cannot think and who knows 
nothing could not be conscious, neither could such an one feel. As an illustration, a man goes to 
the hospital to submit to a serious operation. Before the surgeon begins to use the knife he puts 
his patient under the influence of an anesthetic for the express purpose of producing 
unconsciousness, because he does not wish the patient to feel and thereby suffer pain of the 
operation. 
CEASES TO HATE. 
"We must keep in mind that my opponent and myself have agreed that the Bible is the authority 
by which these questions shall be settled, and mere theory and conjecture should not be 
tolerated. Then let us have some more Bible proof upon the proposition. A dead man ceases to 
love, ceases to hate and ceases to envy. (Ecclesiastes 9:6.) 
"Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly state that he 'knows not anything.' (Ecclesiastes 9:50.) The 
dead stop working; there is no more device and no more scheming. 'Whatsoever thy hand 
findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor 
wisdom, in the grave whither thou goest.' (Ecclesiastes 9:10.) 
"I submit that when a man reaches the point where he cannot remember; cannot give thanks; 
cannot speak; cannot breathe; does not think; has no feeling; neither loves, hates or envies; does 
not work; and knows not anything, he must be actually and completely dead, therefore 
unconscious. 
PERISHED. 
"To perish means to be destroyed; to be cut off; to cease to exist. -- Dr. Strong. Therefore, a 
creature that has perished cannot be conscious anywhere. Does man perish when he dies? Let 
the Scriptures answer. 'For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person 
perish, and leave their wealth to others. Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue 
forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. 
Nevertheless, man being in honor abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.' (Psalms 
49:10,12.) 
 WHY MEN DIE. 
"It is a principle of God's law that every perfect, righteous creature is entitled to life. It follows 
that every unrighteous creature has no legal right to life. God enforced his judgment against 
Adam in a gradual manner, viz -- by forcing Adam out of Eden, where the food was perfect, 
and forcing him to obtain his food or sustenance from the unfinished earth, which brought forth 
or produced poisonous foods. As he partook of these poisonous foods, disease was taken into 
his blood and the death process began and was gradual until he was completely dead. Adam 
was legally dead when driven from Eden, actually and completely dead 930 years later. 
"Adam was given power, before he sinned, to transmit the spark of life, or life principle, to his 
children. The judgment of God deprived him of his legal right to life and that judgment pursued 
the power of reproduction; in other words, his offspring were begotten under the disability that 
their father was laboring under, viz.: without legal right to life, and the Father Adam 
transmitted to his offspring the same poison or disease that was in his system. The perfect man 
Adam begot no children. His children he begot after he was under the sentence of death, and 
therefore he transmitted to all of his offspring the disease in his own body. Consequently, by 
operation of God's law, all of Adam's children inherited death and were born legally dead, or 
without a legal right to life. In proof of this we read, in Psalms 51:5, 'Behold, I was shapen in 
iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me'; and again (Romans 5:12). 'As by the 
disobedience of one man sin entered the world, and death by sin, therefore death passed upon 
all men, for all have sinned.' It follows that every man that has died, died because of the 
judgment that was justly placed against Adam and which by inheritance came upon his 
offspring. Every man thus justly dying would, of necessity, remain dead forever unless God 
had made some provision for his redemption and resurrection. 
REDEMPTION. 
"In John 3:16 we read; 'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that 
whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have everlasting life.' 
"I submit that these words of the Master conclusively prove that the dead are unconscious until 
the awakening to the resurrection. A creature that perishes could not have consciousness, and in 
this Scripture the statement is made that all would perish forever without the provision God 
made for redemption through Jesus Christ. 
"My opponent must concede, if he believes the Bible, that none would be saved without 
believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. This Scripture is positive that all of us would perish. 
"Thus we see we are not limited to the Old Testament to prove that the dead are unconscious 
until the awakening to the resurrection.
 PROPOSITION. 
"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and 
the moment of awakening to the resurrection. 
"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not 
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find: 
"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and 
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious. 
"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of 
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the 
opposite of sleep is to be awake and 
"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not 
conscious. 
DEFINITIONS. 
"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death. 
"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will 
be conceded by my opponent. 
"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges. 
"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased 
to perform their functions. 
"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am 
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct 
ones. 
"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or 
mental operations; possessing knowledge. 
"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of 
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything. 
"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument. 
 WHAT IS MAN? 
"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is 
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being, 
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal? 
"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and 
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like 
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and 
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever, 
and is always conscious. 
"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal, 
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A 
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception, 
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just 
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on 
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or 
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The 
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'. 
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings. 
BIBLE ANSWER. 
"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.) 
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.) 
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1 
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.' 
(1 Corinthians 15:46.) 
"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is 
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times 
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the 
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the 
word 'being.' 
"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from 
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is 
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely. 
THE SOUL. 
"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground 
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.) 
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious 
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess 
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the 
creature, the man. 
"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of 
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is 
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men 
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the 
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all 
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing 
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man 
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust, 
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.) 
"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will 
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death? 
"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man 
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that 
thing! 
PENALTY OF THE LAW. 
"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that 
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then 
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was 
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will 
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4). 
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and 
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?' 
MAN NOT IMMORTAL. 
"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and 
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that 
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has 
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear 
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still 
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture 
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.' 
THE FIRST LIE. 
"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable 
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked, 
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye 
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis 
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of 
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the 
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age. 
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should 
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan 
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no 
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the 
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully 
practiced upon the people. 
WHO IS IMMORTAL? 
"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction 
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures 
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real 
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of 
truth and makes this distinction. 
"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is 
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the 
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that 
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians 
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future 
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to 
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of 
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give 
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.) 
THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS. 
"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be 
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some 
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we 
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible. 
WITHOUT MEMORY. 
"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to 
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?' 
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall 
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10, 
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious. 
 SPEAK NOT. 
"They also cease speaking. 'The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into 
silence.' Psalms 115-17.) 
NEITHER BREATHE, THINK, FEEL. 
"They also stop breathing, thinking and feeling. 'Thou takest away their breath; they die and 
return to the dust.' (Psalms 104:29.) 'His breath goeth forth, he returneth to the earth; in that 
very day his thoughts perish.' (Psalms 146:4.) A person that cannot think and who knows 
nothing could not be conscious, neither could such an one feel. As an illustration, a man goes to 
the hospital to submit to a serious operation. Before the surgeon begins to use the knife he puts 
his patient under the influence of an anesthetic for the express purpose of producing 
unconsciousness, because he does not wish the patient to feel and thereby suffer pain of the 
operation. 
CEASES TO HATE. 
"We must keep in mind that my opponent and myself have agreed that the Bible is the authority 
by which these questions shall be settled, and mere theory and conjecture should not be 
tolerated. Then let us have some more Bible proof upon the proposition. A dead man ceases to 
love, ceases to hate and ceases to envy. (Ecclesiastes 9:6.) 
"Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly state that he 'knows not anything.' (Ecclesiastes 9:50.) The 
dead stop working; there is no more device and no more scheming. 'Whatsoever thy hand 
findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor 
wisdom, in the grave whither thou goest.' (Ecclesiastes 9:10.) 
"I submit that when a man reaches the point where he cannot remember; cannot give thanks; 
cannot speak; cannot breathe; does not think; has no feeling; neither loves, hates or envies; does 
not work; and knows not anything, he must be actually and completely dead, therefore 
unconscious. 
PERISHED. 
"To perish means to be destroyed; to be cut off; to cease to exist. -- Dr. Strong. Therefore, a 
creature that has perished cannot be conscious anywhere. Does man perish when he dies? Let 
the Scriptures answer. 'For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person 
perish, and leave their wealth to others. Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue 
forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. 
Nevertheless, man being in honor abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.' (Psalms 
49:10,12.) 
 WHY MEN DIE. 
"It is a principle of God's law that every perfect, righteous creature is entitled to life. It follows 
that every unrighteous creature has no legal right to life. God enforced his judgment against 
Adam in a gradual manner, viz -- by forcing Adam out of Eden, where the food was perfect, 
and forcing him to obtain his food or sustenance from the unfinished earth, which brought forth 
or produced poisonous foods. As he partook of these poisonous foods, disease was taken into 
his blood and the death process began and was gradual until he was completely dead. Adam 
was legally dead when driven from Eden, actually and completely dead 930 years later. 
"Adam was given power, before he sinned, to transmit the spark of life, or life principle, to his 
children. The judgment of God deprived him of his legal right to life and that judgment pursued 
the power of reproduction; in other words, his offspring were begotten under the disability that 
their father was laboring under, viz.: without legal right to life, and the Father Adam 
transmitted to his offspring the same poison or disease that was in his system. The perfect man 
Adam begot no children. His children he begot after he was under the sentence of death, and 
therefore he transmitted to all of his offspring the disease in his own body. Consequently, by 
operation of God's law, all of Adam's children inherited death and were born legally dead, or 
without a legal right to life. In proof of this we read, in Psalms 51:5, 'Behold, I was shapen in 
iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me'; and again (Romans 5:12). 'As by the 
disobedience of one man sin entered the world, and death by sin, therefore death passed upon 
all men, for all have sinned.' It follows that every man that has died, died because of the 
judgment that was justly placed against Adam and which by inheritance came upon his 
offspring. Every man thus justly dying would, of necessity, remain dead forever unless God 
had made some provision for his redemption and resurrection. 
REDEMPTION. 
"In John 3:16 we read; 'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that 
whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have everlasting life.' 
"I submit that these words of the Master conclusively prove that the dead are unconscious until 
the awakening to the resurrection. A creature that perishes could not have consciousness, and in 
this Scripture the statement is made that all would perish forever without the provision God 
made for redemption through Jesus Christ. 
"My opponent must concede, if he believes the Bible, that none would be saved without 
believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. This Scripture is positive that all of us would perish. 
"Thus we see we are not limited to the Old Testament to prove that the dead are unconscious 
until the awakening to the resurrection. 
MORE PROOF. 
"St. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15:16, 18, says: 'If the dead rise not, then Christ is not raised, and if 
Christ be not raised your faith is vain, ye are yet in your sins; then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.' Mark, he says that even Christians are perished, utterly 
destroyed, if there be no resurrection. They are already perished, because dead, and their future 
life is absolutely dependent upon the resurrection. 
"Now I ask my opponent to answer this question: If the dead are perished unless there is a 
resurrection, how would it be possible for that creature to be conscious prior to the time of 
being awakened to the resurrection? Resurrection really means re-creation -- bringing again to 
perfect condition of life. 
WHY RESURRECTION POSSIBLE? 
"While we must leave for a subsequent argument a more detailed discussion of the philosophy 
of the ransom sacrifice, it is necessary here to call attention to some of the cardinal points 
thereof. 
"The perfect man Adam sinned, and thereby forfeited all his right to life. Before his sin the 
entire human race, unborn, was in his loins; that is to say, he had the power to produce the race 
and in this sense the whole race had a life-standing in Adam. When he sinned all his rights 
were lost, hence all of his offspring were born legally dead. The apostle emphasizes this fact 
when he says; 'In Adam all die.' 
"God's law provided that his judgment might be satisfied by the voluntary death of another 
equal to Adam, 'a life for a life.' (Exodus 21:23.) Jesus partook of flesh and blood for the very 
purpose of redeeming man. (Hebrews 2:9.) He stated (Mark 10:45) that he came to give his life 
a ransom (corresponding price). By his death and resurrection from the dead the Lord provided 
the ransom price for Adam and his offspring. This was an absolute guarantee that the entire 
human race, in God's due time, would be released from the condemnation of death and 
awakened to a resurrection. Because the penalty of sin is death and death means cessation of 
life, it was necessary for the man, Christ Jesus, to die in order to redeem mankind from that 
death sentence; and the fact of his death and resurrection, the apostle argues, is conclusive 
proof that all the dead shall come forth. 
DEATH -- SLEEP. 
"Since God has made provision for the awakening of the dead to the resurrection, the Bible 
frequently speaks of death as sleep. Sleep is a symbol of death, and the word is used in that 
sense. A man lies down to sleep and we say he will wake again. And so we say with reference 
to the dead -- 'He shall awake and come again.' As the Prophet Jeremiah beautifully states the 
matter (Jeremiah 31:15-16), 'Thus sayeth the Lord, a voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, 
and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, 
because they were not. Thus sayeth the Lord, refrain thy voice from weeping and thine eyes 
from tears; for thy work shall be rewarded saith the Lord; and they shall come again from the 
land of the enemy. Thy children shall come again to their own border." This Scripture proves 
that the dead were out of existence but there was hope for a resurrection. 

PROPOSITION. 
"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and 
the moment of awakening to the resurrection. 
"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not 
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find: 
"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and 
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious. 
"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of 
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the 
opposite of sleep is to be awake and 
"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not 
conscious. 
DEFINITIONS. 
"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death. 
"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will 
be conceded by my opponent. 
"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges. 
"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased 
to perform their functions. 
"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am 
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct 
ones. 
"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or 
mental operations; possessing knowledge. 
"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of 
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything. 
"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument. 
 WHAT IS MAN? 
"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is 
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being, 
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal? 
"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and 
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like 
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and 
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever, 
and is always conscious. 
"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal, 
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A 
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception, 
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just 
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on 
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or 
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The 
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'. 
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings. 
BIBLE ANSWER. 
"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.) 
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.) 
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1 
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.' 
(1 Corinthians 15:46.) 
"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is 
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times 
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the 
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the 
word 'being.' 
"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from 
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is 
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely. 
THE SOUL. 
"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground 
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.) 
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious 
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess 
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the 
creature, the man. 
"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of 
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is 
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men 
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the 
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all 
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing 
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man 
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust, 
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.) 
"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will 
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death? 
"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man 
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that 
thing! 
PENALTY OF THE LAW. 
"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that 
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then 
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was 
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will 
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4). 
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and 
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?' 
MAN NOT IMMORTAL. 
"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and 
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that 
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has 
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear 
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still 
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture 
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.' 
THE FIRST LIE. 
"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable 
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked, 
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye 
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis 
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of 
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the 
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age. 
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should 
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan 
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no 
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the 
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully 
practiced upon the people. 
WHO IS IMMORTAL? 
"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction 
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures 
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real 
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of 
truth and makes this distinction. 
"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is 
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the 
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that 
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians 
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future 
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to 
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of 
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give 
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.) 
THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS. 
"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be 
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some 
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we 
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible. 
WITHOUT MEMORY. 
"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to 
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?' 
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall 
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10, 
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious. 
 SPEAK NOT. 
"They also cease speaking. 'The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into 
silence.' Psalms 115-17.) 
NEITHER BREATHE, THINK, FEEL. 
"They also stop breathing, thinking and feeling. 'Thou takest away their breath; they die and 
return to the dust.' (Psalms 104:29.) 'His breath goeth forth, he returneth to the earth; in that 
very day his thoughts perish.' (Psalms 146:4.) A person that cannot think and who knows 
nothing could not be conscious, neither could such an one feel. As an illustration, a man goes to 
the hospital to submit to a serious operation. Before the surgeon begins to use the knife he puts 
his patient under the influence of an anesthetic for the express purpose of producing 
unconsciousness, because he does not wish the patient to feel and thereby suffer pain of the 
operation. 
CEASES TO HATE. 
"We must keep in mind that my opponent and myself have agreed that the Bible is the authority 
by which these questions shall be settled, and mere theory and conjecture should not be 
tolerated. Then let us have some more Bible proof upon the proposition. A dead man ceases to 
love, ceases to hate and ceases to envy. (Ecclesiastes 9:6.) 
"Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly state that he 'knows not anything.' (Ecclesiastes 9:50.) The 
dead stop working; there is no more device and no more scheming. 'Whatsoever thy hand 
findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor 
wisdom, in the grave whither thou goest.' (Ecclesiastes 9:10.) 
"I submit that when a man reaches the point where he cannot remember; cannot give thanks; 
cannot speak; cannot breathe; does not think; has no feeling; neither loves, hates or envies; does 
not work; and knows not anything, he must be actually and completely dead, therefore 
unconscious. 
PERISHED. 
"To perish means to be destroyed; to be cut off; to cease to exist. -- Dr. Strong. Therefore, a 
creature that has perished cannot be conscious anywhere. Does man perish when he dies? Let 
the Scriptures answer. 'For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person 
perish, and leave their wealth to others. Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue 
forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. 
Nevertheless, man being in honor abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.' (Psalms 
49:10,12.) 
 WHY MEN DIE. 
"It is a principle of God's law that every perfect, righteous creature is entitled to life. It follows 
that every unrighteous creature has no legal right to life. God enforced his judgment against 
Adam in a gradual manner, viz -- by forcing Adam out of Eden, where the food was perfect, 
and forcing him to obtain his food or sustenance from the unfinished earth, which brought forth 
or produced poisonous foods. As he partook of these poisonous foods, disease was taken into 
his blood and the death process began and was gradual until he was completely dead. Adam 
was legally dead when driven from Eden, actually and completely dead 930 years later. 
"Adam was given power, before he sinned, to transmit the spark of life, or life principle, to his 
children. The judgment of God deprived him of his legal right to life and that judgment pursued 
the power of reproduction; in other words, his offspring were begotten under the disability that 
their father was laboring under, viz.: without legal right to life, and the Father Adam 
transmitted to his offspring the same poison or disease that was in his system. The perfect man 
Adam begot no children. His children he begot after he was under the sentence of death, and 
therefore he transmitted to all of his offspring the disease in his own body. Consequently, by 
operation of God's law, all of Adam's children inherited death and were born legally dead, or 
without a legal right to life. In proof of this we read, in Psalms 51:5, 'Behold, I was shapen in 
iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me'; and again (Romans 5:12). 'As by the 
disobedience of one man sin entered the world, and death by sin, therefore death passed upon 
all men, for all have sinned.' It follows that every man that has died, died because of the 
judgment that was justly placed against Adam and which by inheritance came upon his 
offspring. Every man thus justly dying would, of necessity, remain dead forever unless God 
had made some provision for his redemption and resurrection. 
REDEMPTION. 
"In John 3:16 we read; 'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that 
whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have everlasting life.' 
"I submit that these words of the Master conclusively prove that the dead are unconscious until 
the awakening to the resurrection. A creature that perishes could not have consciousness, and in 
this Scripture the statement is made that all would perish forever without the provision God 
made for redemption through Jesus Christ. 
"My opponent must concede, if he believes the Bible, that none would be saved without 
believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. This Scripture is positive that all of us would perish. 
"Thus we see we are not limited to the Old Testament to prove that the dead are unconscious 
until the awakening to the resurrection. 
MORE PROOF. 
"St. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15:16, 18, says: 'If the dead rise not, then Christ is not raised, and if 
Christ be not raised your faith is vain, ye are yet in your sins; then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.' Mark, he says that even Christians are perished, utterly 
destroyed, if there be no resurrection. They are already perished, because dead, and their future 
life is absolutely dependent upon the resurrection. 
"Now I ask my opponent to answer this question: If the dead are perished unless there is a 
resurrection, how would it be possible for that creature to be conscious prior to the time of 
being awakened to the resurrection? Resurrection really means re-creation -- bringing again to 
perfect condition of life. 
WHY RESURRECTION POSSIBLE? 
"While we must leave for a subsequent argument a more detailed discussion of the philosophy 
of the ransom sacrifice, it is necessary here to call attention to some of the cardinal points 
thereof. 
"The perfect man Adam sinned, and thereby forfeited all his right to life. Before his sin the 
entire human race, unborn, was in his loins; that is to say, he had the power to produce the race 
and in this sense the whole race had a life-standing in Adam. When he sinned all his rights 
were lost, hence all of his offspring were born legally dead. The apostle emphasizes this fact 
when he says; 'In Adam all die.' 
"God's law provided that his judgment might be satisfied by the voluntary death of another 
equal to Adam, 'a life for a life.' (Exodus 21:23.) Jesus partook of flesh and blood for the very 
purpose of redeeming man. (Hebrews 2:9.) He stated (Mark 10:45) that he came to give his life 
a ransom (corresponding price). By his death and resurrection from the dead the Lord provided 
the ransom price for Adam and his offspring. This was an absolute guarantee that the entire 
human race, in God's due time, would be released from the condemnation of death and 
awakened to a resurrection. Because the penalty of sin is death and death means cessation of 
life, it was necessary for the man, Christ Jesus, to die in order to redeem mankind from that 
death sentence; and the fact of his death and resurrection, the apostle argues, is conclusive 
proof that all the dead shall come forth. 
DEATH -- SLEEP. 
"Since God has made provision for the awakening of the dead to the resurrection, the Bible 
frequently speaks of death as sleep. Sleep is a symbol of death, and the word is used in that 
sense. A man lies down to sleep and we say he will wake again. And so we say with reference 
to the dead -- 'He shall awake and come again.' As the Prophet Jeremiah beautifully states the 
matter (Jeremiah 31:15-16), 'Thus sayeth the Lord, a voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, 
and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, 
because they were not. Thus sayeth the Lord, refrain thy voice from weeping and thine eyes 
from tears; for thy work shall be rewarded saith the Lord; and they shall come again from the 
land of the enemy. Thy children shall come again to their own border." This Scripture proves 
that the dead were out of existence but there was hope for a resurrection. 
 "Both the Old and New Testaments abound with expressions referring to the dead as asleep. 
We read, 1 Kings 2:10, that 'David slept with his fathers and was buried in the city of David.' 
St. Peter says, 'The fathers fell asleep. (2 Peter 3:4.) St. Paul, speaking of those who had seen 
Jesus in the flesh, said, 'The greater part remain until this day, but some are fallen asleep.' (1 
Corinthians 15:6.) Again, 'I would not have you ignorant, brethren, concerning them that are 
asleep. Them that sleep in Jesus God will bring forth by Jesus at the resurrection.' (1 
Thessalonians 4:3-14.) 
SLEEPING -- UNCONSCIOUS. 
"Who ever heard of one sleeping soundly and being conscious at the same time? Sleep means 
suspension of the voluntary exercise of the functions of the body and mind. Sleep is used as a 
symbol of death. The reality is more pronounced than the symbol. If the symbol represents 
unconsciousness, the reality does even more so. 
"The death sleep is so absolutely a period of unconsciousness that the awakening one will have 
no knowledge of the lapse of time or the transpiring of events. Now we will prove the truth of 
this statement by the Lord Jesus' own testimony. In John, 11th chapter, verses 1 to 44 (John 
11:1-44), we find this proof, which we paraphrase. Lazarus lived with his two sisters at 
Bethany. Jesus was often entertained at this home and taught the members of the household. 
Lazarus became sick. Word was sent to Jesus of Lazarus' illness, but after he heard it Jesus 
remained in the same place for two days longer. He was preparing to teach mankind a great 
lesson concerning the dead and how they shall be awakened out of the sleep of death. At the 
end of the two days, speaking to his disciples, he said, 'Our friend Lazarus sleepeth.' His 
disciples replied, 'Lord if he sleepeth he doeth well, but Jesus spake of his death, but they 
thought he had spoken of taking rest in sleep. Then said Jesus unto them plainly, 'Lazarus is 
dead.' Thomas suggested that they go to Bethany at once. Jesus and his disciples went. Arriving 
at Bethany they found that Lazarus had been dead and buried for four days. Jesus here 
performed a great miracle, which testified in no uncertain terms as to the condition of the dead 
and proves beyond all doubt that the dead are wholly unconscious until the awakening to the 
resurrection. Mark what he did! He did not call Lazarus out of heaven, nor out of purgatory, nor 
a lake of fire and brimstone, but after giving thanks to God he went to the grave, which was a 
cave in the hillside, and cried with a loud voice, 'Lazarus, come forth,' and the dead came forth. 
"Let my opponent answer this question if he will: If Lazarus was at all conscious during the 
four days that he was dead and in the grave, why is there not some proof of it some-where to be 
found in the Bible? Jesus was here showing how the dead are to be awakened out of the sleep 
of death. It was of the greatest importance, if Lazarus had been conscious, that some proof of 
that fact might have been recorded. The fact that nothing is said about his being conscious, 
taken in con-junction with numerous other Scriptures that show that the dead are wholly 
unconscious, is conclusive proof that Lazarus was unconscious for four days while dead and PROPOSITION. 
"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and 
the moment of awakening to the resurrection. 
"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not 
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find: 
"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and 
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious. 
"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of 
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the 
opposite of sleep is to be awake and 
"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not 
conscious. 
DEFINITIONS. 
"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death. 
"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will 
be conceded by my opponent. 
"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges. 
"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased 
to perform their functions. 
"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am 
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct 
ones. 
"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or 
mental operations; possessing knowledge. 
"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of 
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything. 
"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument. 
 WHAT IS MAN? 
"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is 
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being, 
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal? 
"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and 
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like 
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and 
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever, 
and is always conscious. 
"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal, 
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A 
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception, 
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just 
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on 
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or 
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The 
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'. 
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings. 
BIBLE ANSWER. 
"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.) 
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.) 
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1 
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.' 
(1 Corinthians 15:46.) 
"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is 
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times 
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the 
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the 
word 'being.' 
"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from 
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is 
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely. 
THE SOUL. 
"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground 
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.) 
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious 
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess 
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the 
creature, the man. 
"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of 
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is 
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men 
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the 
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all 
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing 
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man 
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust, 
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.) 
"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will 
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death? 
"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man 
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that 
thing! 
PENALTY OF THE LAW. 
"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that 
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then 
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was 
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will 
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4). 
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and 
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?' 
MAN NOT IMMORTAL. 
"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and 
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that 
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has 
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear 
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still 
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture 
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.' 
THE FIRST LIE. 
"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable 
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked, 
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye 
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis 
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of 
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the 
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age. 
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should 
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan 
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no 
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the 
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully 
practiced upon the people. 
WHO IS IMMORTAL? 
"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction 
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures 
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real 
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of 
truth and makes this distinction. 
"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is 
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the 
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that 
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians 
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future 
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to 
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of 
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give 
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.) 
THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS. 
"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be 
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some 
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we 
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible. 
WITHOUT MEMORY. 
"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to 
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?' 
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall 
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10, 
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious. 
 SPEAK NOT. 
"They also cease speaking. 'The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into 
silence.' Psalms 115-17.) 
NEITHER BREATHE, THINK, FEEL. 
"They also stop breathing, thinking and feeling. 'Thou takest away their breath; they die and 
return to the dust.' (Psalms 104:29.) 'His breath goeth forth, he returneth to the earth; in that 
very day his thoughts perish.' (Psalms 146:4.) A person that cannot think and who knows 
nothing could not be conscious, neither could such an one feel. As an illustration, a man goes to 
the hospital to submit to a serious operation. Before the surgeon begins to use the knife he puts 
his patient under the influence of an anesthetic for the express purpose of producing 
unconsciousness, because he does not wish the patient to feel and thereby suffer pain of the 
operation. 
CEASES TO HATE. 
"We must keep in mind that my opponent and myself have agreed that the Bible is the authority 
by which these questions shall be settled, and mere theory and conjecture should not be 
tolerated. Then let us have some more Bible proof upon the proposition. A dead man ceases to 
love, ceases to hate and ceases to envy. (Ecclesiastes 9:6.) 
"Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly state that he 'knows not anything.' (Ecclesiastes 9:50.) The 
dead stop working; there is no more device and no more scheming. 'Whatsoever thy hand 
findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor 
wisdom, in the grave whither thou goest.' (Ecclesiastes 9:10.) 
"I submit that when a man reaches the point where he cannot remember; cannot give thanks; 
cannot speak; cannot breathe; does not think; has no feeling; neither loves, hates or envies; does 
not work; and knows not anything, he must be actually and completely dead, therefore 
unconscious. 
PERISHED. 
"To perish means to be destroyed; to be cut off; to cease to exist. -- Dr. Strong. Therefore, a 
creature that has perished cannot be conscious anywhere. Does man perish when he dies? Let 
the Scriptures answer. 'For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person 
perish, and leave their wealth to others. Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue 
forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. 
Nevertheless, man being in honor abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.' (Psalms 
49:10,12.) 
 WHY MEN DIE. 
"It is a principle of God's law that every perfect, righteous creature is entitled to life. It follows 
that every unrighteous creature has no legal right to life. God enforced his judgment against 
Adam in a gradual manner, viz -- by forcing Adam out of Eden, where the food was perfect, 
and forcing him to obtain his food or sustenance from the unfinished earth, which brought forth 
or produced poisonous foods. As he partook of these poisonous foods, disease was taken into 
his blood and the death process began and was gradual until he was completely dead. Adam 
was legally dead when driven from Eden, actually and completely dead 930 years later. 
"Adam was given power, before he sinned, to transmit the spark of life, or life principle, to his 
children. The judgment of God deprived him of his legal right to life and that judgment pursued 
the power of reproduction; in other words, his offspring were begotten under the disability that 
their father was laboring under, viz.: without legal right to life, and the Father Adam 
transmitted to his offspring the same poison or disease that was in his system. The perfect man 
Adam begot no children. His children he begot after he was under the sentence of death, and 
therefore he transmitted to all of his offspring the disease in his own body. Consequently, by 
operation of God's law, all of Adam's children inherited death and were born legally dead, or 
without a legal right to life. In proof of this we read, in Psalms 51:5, 'Behold, I was shapen in 
iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me'; and again (Romans 5:12). 'As by the 
disobedience of one man sin entered the world, and death by sin, therefore death passed upon 
all men, for all have sinned.' It follows that every man that has died, died because of the 
judgment that was justly placed against Adam and which by inheritance came upon his 
offspring. Every man thus justly dying would, of necessity, remain dead forever unless God 
had made some provision for his redemption and resurrection. 
REDEMPTION. 
"In John 3:16 we read; 'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that 
whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have everlasting life.' 
"I submit that these words of the Master conclusively prove that the dead are unconscious until 
the awakening to the resurrection. A creature that perishes could not have consciousness, and in 
this Scripture the statement is made that all would perish forever without the provision God 
made for redemption through Jesus Christ. 
"My opponent must concede, if he believes the Bible, that none would be saved without 
believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. This Scripture is positive that all of us would perish. 
"Thus we see we are not limited to the Old Testament to prove that the dead are unconscious 
until the awakening to the resurrection. 
MORE PROOF. 
"St. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15:16, 18, says: 'If the dead rise not, then Christ is not raised, and if 
Christ be not raised your faith is vain, ye are yet in your sins; then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.' Mark, he says that even Christians are perished, utterly 
destroyed, if there be no resurrection. They are already perished, because dead, and their future 
life is absolutely dependent upon the resurrection. 
"Now I ask my opponent to answer this question: If the dead are perished unless there is a 
resurrection, how would it be possible for that creature to be conscious prior to the time of 
being awakened to the resurrection? Resurrection really means re-creation -- bringing again to 
perfect condition of life. 
WHY RESURRECTION POSSIBLE? 
"While we must leave for a subsequent argument a more detailed discussion of the philosophy 
of the ransom sacrifice, it is necessary here to call attention to some of the cardinal points 
thereof. 
"The perfect man Adam sinned, and thereby forfeited all his right to life. Before his sin the 
entire human race, unborn, was in his loins; that is to say, he had the power to produce the race 
and in this sense the whole race had a life-standing in Adam. When he sinned all his rights 
were lost, hence all of his offspring were born legally dead. The apostle emphasizes this fact 
when he says; 'In Adam all die.' 
"God's law provided that his judgment might be satisfied by the voluntary death of another 
equal to Adam, 'a life for a life.' (Exodus 21:23.) Jesus partook of flesh and blood for the very 
purpose of redeeming man. (Hebrews 2:9.) He stated (Mark 10:45) that he came to give his life 
a ransom (corresponding price). By his death and resurrection from the dead the Lord provided 
the ransom price for Adam and his offspring. This was an absolute guarantee that the entire 
human race, in God's due time, would be released from the condemnation of death and 
awakened to a resurrection. Because the penalty of sin is death and death means cessation of 
life, it was necessary for the man, Christ Jesus, to die in order to redeem mankind from that 
death sentence; and the fact of his death and resurrection, the apostle argues, is conclusive 
proof that all the dead shall come forth. 
DEATH -- SLEEP. 
"Since God has made provision for the awakening of the dead to the resurrection, the Bible 
frequently speaks of death as sleep. Sleep is a symbol of death, and the word is used in that 
sense. A man lies down to sleep and we say he will wake again. And so we say with reference 
to the dead -- 'He shall awake and come again.' As the Prophet Jeremiah beautifully states the 
matter (Jeremiah 31:15-16), 'Thus sayeth the Lord, a voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, 
and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, 
because they were not. Thus sayeth the Lord, refrain thy voice from weeping and thine eyes 
from tears; for thy work shall be rewarded saith the Lord; and they shall come again from the 
land of the enemy. Thy children shall come again to their own border." This Scripture proves 
that the dead were out of existence but there was hope for a resurrection. 
 "Both the Old and New Testaments abound with expressions referring to the dead as asleep. 
We read, 1 Kings 2:10, that 'David slept with his fathers and was buried in the city of David.' 
St. Peter says, 'The fathers fell asleep. (2 Peter 3:4.) St. Paul, speaking of those who had seen 
Jesus in the flesh, said, 'The greater part remain until this day, but some are fallen asleep.' (1 
Corinthians 15:6.) Again, 'I would not have you ignorant, brethren, concerning them that are 
asleep. Them that sleep in Jesus God will bring forth by Jesus at the resurrection.' (1 
Thessalonians 4:3-14.) 
SLEEPING -- UNCONSCIOUS. 
"Who ever heard of one sleeping soundly and being conscious at the same time? Sleep means 
suspension of the voluntary exercise of the functions of the body and mind. Sleep is used as a 
symbol of death. The reality is more pronounced than the symbol. If the symbol represents 
unconsciousness, the reality does even more so. 
"The death sleep is so absolutely a period of unconsciousness that the awakening one will have 
no knowledge of the lapse of time or the transpiring of events. Now we will prove the truth of 
this statement by the Lord Jesus' own testimony. In John, 11th chapter, verses 1 to 44 (John 
11:1-44), we find this proof, which we paraphrase. Lazarus lived with his two sisters at 
Bethany. Jesus was often entertained at this home and taught the members of the household. 
Lazarus became sick. Word was sent to Jesus of Lazarus' illness, but after he heard it Jesus 
remained in the same place for two days longer. He was preparing to teach mankind a great 
lesson concerning the dead and how they shall be awakened out of the sleep of death. At the 
end of the two days, speaking to his disciples, he said, 'Our friend Lazarus sleepeth.' His 
disciples replied, 'Lord if he sleepeth he doeth well, but Jesus spake of his death, but they 
thought he had spoken of taking rest in sleep. Then said Jesus unto them plainly, 'Lazarus is 
dead.' Thomas suggested that they go to Bethany at once. Jesus and his disciples went. Arriving 
at Bethany they found that Lazarus had been dead and buried for four days. Jesus here 
performed a great miracle, which testified in no uncertain terms as to the condition of the dead 
and proves beyond all doubt that the dead are wholly unconscious until the awakening to the 
resurrection. Mark what he did! He did not call Lazarus out of heaven, nor out of purgatory, nor 
a lake of fire and brimstone, but after giving thanks to God he went to the grave, which was a 
cave in the hillside, and cried with a loud voice, 'Lazarus, come forth,' and the dead came forth. 
"Let my opponent answer this question if he will: If Lazarus was at all conscious during the 
four days that he was dead and in the grave, why is there not some proof of it some-where to be 
found in the Bible? Jesus was here showing how the dead are to be awakened out of the sleep 
of death. It was of the greatest importance, if Lazarus had been conscious, that some proof of 
that fact might have been recorded. The fact that nothing is said about his being conscious, 
taken in con-junction with numerous other Scriptures that show that the dead are wholly 
unconscious, is conclusive proof that Lazarus was unconscious for four days while dead and 
likewise conclusive proof that all the dead are unconscious until the moment of awakening. 
 THE PROPOSITION. 
"The proposition under discussion as stated is a clear admission that the dead are unconscious 
for the reason it assumes -- that there is to be an awakening. Mark the words thereof, 'that the 
dead are unconscious from the moment of death until the moment of awakening to the 
resurrection of the dead.' If the dead were already conscious it follows that they would already 
be awake and therefore there could be no awakening; hence, my opponent admits by the 
statement of the proposition that his contention is wrong. 
"Jesus points out that all the dead are to be awakened to the resurrection. (John 5:28-29.) 
Awakened from where? we ask. From heaven? Purgatory? An intermediate state? Hell, fire and 
brimstone, or where? Let my opponent answer, but before he answers let God's word answer, 
which says, "They that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake.' (Daniel 12:2.) likewise conclusive proof that all the dead are unconscious until the moment of awakening. 

WHAT IS TO BE AWAKENED. 
"What, then, is to be awakened to the resurrection, the soul, body or what? My opponent will 
tell you that the soul is still alive, therefore awake; hence could not be awakened. To be 
consistent, he will be compelled to say that it is the body thatis to be awakened. Then we ask 
him, if the soul is alive without a body and is enjoying life, and the same old body that it once 
had is to be awakened, why cumber it with that body? Such a contention is wholly 
unreasonable. These old bodies have given us a great deal of trouble. Most men who live to 
maturity, or beyond that, have bodies that are very ugly, and I am sure it would not be a joy to 
think about carrying around such a body to endless ages. 
"But how absurd the proposition that it is this old body that is to be awakened! How would that 
body ever be gotten together? To illustrate: A man dies and is buried. Later an orange tree is 
planted upon his grave. The roots, running down into the grave, absorb all the chemical 
elements of that body and these, in turn, are transmitted to the bud that forms the fruit. The fruit 
matures. Some of it is fed to pigs and these are shipped away and consumed by man, other 
parts of the oranges are shipped to different parts of the earth, and thus the chemical elements 
of that body are scattered everywhere. The further we pursue this illustration, the more absurd 
bodily resurrection seems. We are not surprised, then, that St. Paul says, in 1 Corinthians 
15:35-38, 'Some men will say, how are the dead raised up and with what body to they come? 
Thou fool; that which thou sowest is not quickened except it die, and that which thou sowest, 
thou sowest not the body that shall be * * but God giveth it a body as it pleaseth him.' It is not 
at all the body that is to be resurrected, and this is clearly shown by the words above quoted, 
'God giveth it a body.' What is the 'it?' Mark you, 'it' is that which is resurrected. If my 
opponent says the body is resurrected and then God gives it a body, it follows that it has two 
bodies. 
"When we get a clear understanding of God's plan, this Scripture is entirely clarified. God 
formed man of the dust of the earth, breathed into his nostrils, and man became a living soul. 
The soul was the it. In proof of that mark the words 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' 
Therefore, God made the soul the it. The soul, it dies, and St. Paul says the soul is resurrected, 
and God gives it -- the soul, the being, the man, the creature -- a body as it pleaseth him. And then, in the context, he points out that some will receive spiritual bodies and others natural 
bodies. 
"We submit, upon the whole, that the Scriptures clearly teach that man is a soul; that the soul is 
mortal, subject to God's law; that the soul means man, the creature; the soul (man, creature) 
dies, and would forever remain out of existence, except that God has made provision for 
redemption, awakening and resurrection, and the Scriptures with one accord conclusively prove 
that the soul is unconscious from the moment of death to the moment of awakening to the 
resurrection. 
"Keeping clearly in mind these great truths, the debate tomorrow evening will demonstrate, 
likewise clearly, that God is not a fiend, as has been charged, but a great God of love, justice, 
wisdom and power. 

PROPOSITION. 
"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and 
the moment of awakening to the resurrection. 
"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not 
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find: 
"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and 
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious. 
"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of 
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the 
opposite of sleep is to be awake and 
"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not 
conscious. 
DEFINITIONS. 
"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death. 
"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will 
be conceded by my opponent. 
"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges. 
"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased 
to perform their functions. 
"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am 
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct 
ones. 
"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or 
mental operations; possessing knowledge. 
"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of 
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything. 
"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument. 
 WHAT IS MAN? 
"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is 
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being, 
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal? 
"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and 
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like 
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and 
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever, 
and is always conscious. 
"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal, 
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A 
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception, 
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just 
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on 
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or 
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The 
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'. 
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings. 
BIBLE ANSWER. 
"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.) 
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.) 
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1 
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.' 
(1 Corinthians 15:46.) 
"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is 
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times 
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the 
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the 
word 'being.' 
"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from 
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is 
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely. 
THE SOUL. 
"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground 
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.) 
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious 
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess 
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the 
creature, the man. 
"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of 
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is 
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men 
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the 
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all 
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing 
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man 
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust, 
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.) 
"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will 
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death? 
"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man 
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that 
thing! 
PENALTY OF THE LAW. 
"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that 
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then 
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was 
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will 
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4). 
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and 
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?' 
MAN NOT IMMORTAL. 
"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and 
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that 
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has 
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear 
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still 
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture 
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.' 
THE FIRST LIE. 
"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable 
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked, 
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye 
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis 
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of 
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the 
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age. 
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should 
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan 
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no 
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the 
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully 
practiced upon the people. 
WHO IS IMMORTAL? 
"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction 
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures 
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real 
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of 
truth and makes this distinction. 
"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is 
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the 
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that 
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians 
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future 
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to 
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of 
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give 
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.) 
THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS. 
"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be 
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some 
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we 
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible. 
WITHOUT MEMORY. 
"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to 
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?' 
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall 
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10, 
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious. 
 SPEAK NOT. 
"They also cease speaking. 'The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into 
silence.' Psalms 115-17.) 
NEITHER BREATHE, THINK, FEEL. 
"They also stop breathing, thinking and feeling. 'Thou takest away their breath; they die and 
return to the dust.' (Psalms 104:29.) 'His breath goeth forth, he returneth to the earth; in that 
very day his thoughts perish.' (Psalms 146:4.) A person that cannot think and who knows 
nothing could not be conscious, neither could such an one feel. As an illustration, a man goes to 
the hospital to submit to a serious operation. Before the surgeon begins to use the knife he puts 
his patient under the influence of an anesthetic for the express purpose of producing 
unconsciousness, because he does not wish the patient to feel and thereby suffer pain of the 
operation. 
CEASES TO HATE. 
"We must keep in mind that my opponent and myself have agreed that the Bible is the authority 
by which these questions shall be settled, and mere theory and conjecture should not be 
tolerated. Then let us have some more Bible proof upon the proposition. A dead man ceases to 
love, ceases to hate and ceases to envy. (Ecclesiastes 9:6.) 
"Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly state that he 'knows not anything.' (Ecclesiastes 9:50.) The 
dead stop working; there is no more device and no more scheming. 'Whatsoever thy hand 
findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor 
wisdom, in the grave whither thou goest.' (Ecclesiastes 9:10.) 
"I submit that when a man reaches the point where he cannot remember; cannot give thanks; 
cannot speak; cannot breathe; does not think; has no feeling; neither loves, hates or envies; does 
not work; and knows not anything, he must be actually and completely dead, therefore 
unconscious. 
PERISHED. 
"To perish means to be destroyed; to be cut off; to cease to exist. -- Dr. Strong. Therefore, a 
creature that has perished cannot be conscious anywhere. Does man perish when he dies? Let 
the Scriptures answer. 'For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person 
perish, and leave their wealth to others. Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue 
forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. 
Nevertheless, man being in honor abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.' (Psalms 
49:10,12.) 
 WHY MEN DIE. 
"It is a principle of God's law that every perfect, righteous creature is entitled to life. It follows 
that every unrighteous creature has no legal right to life. God enforced his judgment against 
Adam in a gradual manner, viz -- by forcing Adam out of Eden, where the food was perfect, 
and forcing him to obtain his food or sustenance from the unfinished earth, which brought forth 
or produced poisonous foods. As he partook of these poisonous foods, disease was taken into 
his blood and the death process began and was gradual until he was completely dead. Adam 
was legally dead when driven from Eden, actually and completely dead 930 years later. 
"Adam was given power, before he sinned, to transmit the spark of life, or life principle, to his 
children. The judgment of God deprived him of his legal right to life and that judgment pursued 
the power of reproduction; in other words, his offspring were begotten under the disability that 
their father was laboring under, viz.: without legal right to life, and the Father Adam 
transmitted to his offspring the same poison or disease that was in his system. The perfect man 
Adam begot no children. His children he begot after he was under the sentence of death, and 
therefore he transmitted to all of his offspring the disease in his own body. Consequently, by 
operation of God's law, all of Adam's children inherited death and were born legally dead, or 
without a legal right to life. In proof of this we read, in Psalms 51:5, 'Behold, I was shapen in 
iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me'; and again (Romans 5:12). 'As by the 
disobedience of one man sin entered the world, and death by sin, therefore death passed upon 
all men, for all have sinned.' It follows that every man that has died, died because of the 
judgment that was justly placed against Adam and which by inheritance came upon his 
offspring. Every man thus justly dying would, of necessity, remain dead forever unless God 
had made some provision for his redemption and resurrection. 
REDEMPTION. 
"In John 3:16 we read; 'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that 
whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have everlasting life.' 
"I submit that these words of the Master conclusively prove that the dead are unconscious until 
the awakening to the resurrection. A creature that perishes could not have consciousness, and in 
this Scripture the statement is made that all would perish forever without the provision God 
made for redemption through Jesus Christ. 
"My opponent must concede, if he believes the Bible, that none would be saved without 
believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. This Scripture is positive that all of us would perish. 
"Thus we see we are not limited to the Old Testament to prove that the dead are unconscious 
until the awakening to the resurrection. 
MORE PROOF. 
"St. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15:16, 18, says: 'If the dead rise not, then Christ is not raised, and if 
Christ be not raised your faith is vain, ye are yet in your sins; then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.' Mark, he says that even Christians are perished, utterly 
destroyed, if there be no resurrection. They are already perished, because dead, and their future 
life is absolutely dependent upon the resurrection. 
"Now I ask my opponent to answer this question: If the dead are perished unless there is a 
resurrection, how would it be possible for that creature to be conscious prior to the time of 
being awakened to the resurrection? Resurrection really means re-creation -- bringing again to 
perfect condition of life. 
WHY RESURRECTION POSSIBLE? 
"While we must leave for a subsequent argument a more detailed discussion of the philosophy 
of the ransom sacrifice, it is necessary here to call attention to some of the cardinal points 
thereof. 
"The perfect man Adam sinned, and thereby forfeited all his right to life. Before his sin the 
entire human race, unborn, was in his loins; that is to say, he had the power to produce the race 
and in this sense the whole race had a life-standing in Adam. When he sinned all his rights 
were lost, hence all of his offspring were born legally dead. The apostle emphasizes this fact 
when he says; 'In Adam all die.' 
"God's law provided that his judgment might be satisfied by the voluntary death of another 
equal to Adam, 'a life for a life.' (Exodus 21:23.) Jesus partook of flesh and blood for the very 
purpose of redeeming man. (Hebrews 2:9.) He stated (Mark 10:45) that he came to give his life 
a ransom (corresponding price). By his death and resurrection from the dead the Lord provided 
the ransom price for Adam and his offspring. This was an absolute guarantee that the entire 
human race, in God's due time, would be released from the condemnation of death and 
awakened to a resurrection. Because the penalty of sin is death and death means cessation of 
life, it was necessary for the man, Christ Jesus, to die in order to redeem mankind from that 
death sentence; and the fact of his death and resurrection, the apostle argues, is conclusive 
proof that all the dead shall come forth. 
DEATH -- SLEEP. 
"Since God has made provision for the awakening of the dead to the resurrection, the Bible 
frequently speaks of death as sleep. Sleep is a symbol of death, and the word is used in that 
sense. A man lies down to sleep and we say he will wake again. And so we say with reference 
to the dead -- 'He shall awake and come again.' As the Prophet Jeremiah beautifully states the 
matter (Jeremiah 31:15-16), 'Thus sayeth the Lord, a voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, 
and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, 
because they were not. Thus sayeth the Lord, refrain thy voice from weeping and thine eyes 
from tears; for thy work shall be rewarded saith the Lord; and they shall come again from the 
land of the enemy. Thy children shall come again to their own border." This Scripture proves 
that the dead were out of existence but there was hope for a resurrection. 
 "Both the Old and New Testaments abound with expressions referring to the dead as asleep. 
We read, 1 Kings 2:10, that 'David slept with his fathers and was buried in the city of David.' 
St. Peter says, 'The fathers fell asleep. (2 Peter 3:4.) St. Paul, speaking of those who had seen 
Jesus in the flesh, said, 'The greater part remain until this day, but some are fallen asleep.' (1 
Corinthians 15:6.) Again, 'I would not have you ignorant, brethren, concerning them that are 
asleep. Them that sleep in Jesus God will bring forth by Jesus at the resurrection.' (1 
Thessalonians 4:3-14.) 
SLEEPING -- UNCONSCIOUS. 
"Who ever heard of one sleeping soundly and being conscious at the same time? Sleep means 
suspension of the voluntary exercise of the functions of the body and mind. Sleep is used as a 
symbol of death. The reality is more pronounced than the symbol. If the symbol represents 
unconsciousness, the reality does even more so. 
"The death sleep is so absolutely a period of unconsciousness that the awakening one will have 
no knowledge of the lapse of time or the transpiring of events. Now we will prove the truth of 
this statement by the Lord Jesus' own testimony. In John, 11th chapter, verses 1 to 44 (John 
11:1-44), we find this proof, which we paraphrase. Lazarus lived with his two sisters at 
Bethany. Jesus was often entertained at this home and taught the members of the household. 
Lazarus became sick. Word was sent to Jesus of Lazarus' illness, but after he heard it Jesus 
remained in the same place for two days longer. He was preparing to teach mankind a great 
lesson concerning the dead and how they shall be awakened out of the sleep of death. At the 
end of the two days, speaking to his disciples, he said, 'Our friend Lazarus sleepeth.' His 
disciples replied, 'Lord if he sleepeth he doeth well, but Jesus spake of his death, but they 
thought he had spoken of taking rest in sleep. Then said Jesus unto them plainly, 'Lazarus is 
dead.' Thomas suggested that they go to Bethany at once. Jesus and his disciples went. Arriving 
at Bethany they found that Lazarus had been dead and buried for four days. Jesus here 
performed a great miracle, which testified in no uncertain terms as to the condition of the dead 
and proves beyond all doubt that the dead are wholly unconscious until the awakening to the 
resurrection. Mark what he did! He did not call Lazarus out of heaven, nor out of purgatory, nor 
a lake of fire and brimstone, but after giving thanks to God he went to the grave, which was a 
cave in the hillside, and cried with a loud voice, 'Lazarus, come forth,' and the dead came forth. 
"Let my opponent answer this question if he will: If Lazarus was at all conscious during the 
four days that he was dead and in the grave, why is there not some proof of it some-where to be 
found in the Bible? Jesus was here showing how the dead are to be awakened out of the sleep 
of death. It was of the greatest importance, if Lazarus had been conscious, that some proof of 
that fact might have been recorded. The fact that nothing is said about his being conscious, 
taken in con-junction with numerous other Scriptures that show that the dead are wholly 
unconscious, is conclusive proof that Lazarus was unconscious for four days while dead and 
likewise conclusive proof that all the dead are unconscious until the moment of awakening. 
 THE PROPOSITION. 
"The proposition under discussion as stated is a clear admission that the dead are unconscious 
for the reason it assumes -- that there is to be an awakening. Mark the words thereof, 'that the 
dead are unconscious from the moment of death until the moment of awakening to the 
resurrection of the dead.' If the dead were already conscious it follows that they would already 
be awake and therefore there could be no awakening; hence, my opponent admits by the 
statement of the proposition that his contention is wrong. 
"Jesus points out that all the dead are to be awakened to the resurrection. (John 5:28-29.) 
Awakened from where? we ask. From heaven? Purgatory? An intermediate state? Hell, fire and 
brimstone, or where? Let my opponent answer, but before he answers let God's word answer, 
which says, "They that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake.' (Daniel 12:2.) 
WHAT IS TO BE AWAKENED. 
"What, then, is to be awakened to the resurrection, the soul, body or what? My opponent will 
tell you that the soul is still alive, therefore awake; hence could not be awakened. To be 
consistent, he will be compelled to say that it is the body thatis to be awakened. Then we ask 
him, if the soul is alive without a body and is enjoying life, and the same old body that it once 
had is to be awakened, why cumber it with that body? Such a contention is wholly 
unreasonable. These old bodies have given us a great deal of trouble. Most men who live to 
maturity, or beyond that, have bodies that are very ugly, and I am sure it would not be a joy to 
think about carrying around such a body to endless ages. 
"But how absurd the proposition that it is this old body that is to be awakened! How would that 
body ever be gotten together? To illustrate: A man dies and is buried. Later an orange tree is 
planted upon his grave. The roots, running down into the grave, absorb all the chemical 
elements of that body and these, in turn, are transmitted to the bud that forms the fruit. The fruit 
matures. Some of it is fed to pigs and these are shipped away and consumed by man, other 
parts of the oranges are shipped to different parts of the earth, and thus the chemical elements 
of that body are scattered everywhere. The further we pursue this illustration, the more absurd 
bodily resurrection seems. We are not surprised, then, that St. Paul says, in 1 Corinthians 
15:35-38, 'Some men will say, how are the dead raised up and with what body to they come? 
Thou fool; that which thou sowest is not quickened except it die, and that which thou sowest, 
thou sowest not the body that shall be * * but God giveth it a body as it pleaseth him.' It is not 
at all the body that is to be resurrected, and this is clearly shown by the words above quoted, 
'God giveth it a body.' What is the 'it?' Mark you, 'it' is that which is resurrected. If my 
opponent says the body is resurrected and then God gives it a body, it follows that it has two 
bodies. 
"When we get a clear understanding of God's plan, this Scripture is entirely clarified. God 
formed man of the dust of the earth, breathed into his nostrils, and man became a living soul. 
The soul was the it. In proof of that mark the words 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' 
Therefore, God made the soul the it. The soul, it dies, and St. Paul says the soul is resurrected, 
and God gives it -- the soul, the being, the man, the creature -- a body as it pleaseth him. And then, in the context, he points out that some will receive spiritual bodies and others natural 
bodies. 
"We submit, upon the whole, that the Scriptures clearly teach that man is a soul; that the soul is 
mortal, subject to God's law; that the soul means man, the creature; the soul (man, creature) 
dies, and would forever remain out of existence, except that God has made provision for 
redemption, awakening and resurrection, and the Scriptures with one accord conclusively prove 
that the soul is unconscious from the moment of death to the moment of awakening to the 
resurrection. 
"Keeping clearly in mind these great truths, the debate tomorrow evening will demonstrate, 
likewise clearly, that God is not a fiend, as has been charged, but a great God of love, justice, 
wisdom and power. 
RICH MAN AND LAZARUS. 
"My opponent will cite the rich man and Lazarus in proof that the dead are conscious after 
death and before awakening to the resurrection. A careful examination of this text shows that it 
does not sustain his theory. I am going to ask him now, when he does cite that text, to answer 
this question, Is that scriptural statement to be taken literally or symbolically? Was Jesus 
describing a reality that then existed, or was he giving a parable to teach some lesson? I don't 
care which way he answers it, he will be in a hole. If he answers, 'It is to be taken literally,' then 
you will see the utter absurdity it expresses. If he answers. 'It is a parable,' then it absolutely 
disproves his position. 
PROPOSITION. 
"The scriptures clearly teach that the dead are unconscious between the moment of death and 
the moment of awakening to the resurrection. 
"This proposition I affirm, and my opponent denies the truth thereof. If this proposition is not 
affirmatively true, as stated, then we must find: 
"1. That man, after death, continues mentally active; that is to say -- possesses knowledge and 
continues to exercise his mental functions, therefore conscious. 
"2. We must find that there can be no awakening, for the reason that a conscious person must of 
necessity be awake. Sleep means a temporary loss of mental control, unconsciousness, and the 
opposite of sleep is to be awake and 
"3. We must find that there is no actual or real death, because persons actually dead are not 
conscious. 
DEFINITIONS. 
"The word 'Dead' is used in two senses: (a) Legal death, and (b) Actual death. 
"The proposition we are here discussing is treated from the standpoint of actual death. That will 
be conceded by my opponent. 
"Legal death means to be utterly cut off from certain or fixed rights and privileges. 
"Actual death means destitute of life, inanimate, the state in which the vital organs have ceased 
to perform their functions. 
"These are the definitions given by our best lexicographers -- Webster and others -- and I am 
going to prove in this argument that these are the Bible definitions and therefore the correct 
ones. 
"To be conscious means to have or possess the faculty of knowing one's own thoughts or 
mental operations; possessing knowledge. 
"Unconscious means, of course, the opposite of conscious; that is to say, having no power of 
mental perception, having no knowledge, not knowing or regarding anything. 
"That these are the correct Bible definitions I promise to prove in this argument. 
 WHAT IS MAN? 
"MAN is the subject of this discussion. Is man conscious or unconscious when dead? That is 
the real issue joined here. Pertinent, then, is the question, What is man? Is man a divine being, 
or a human being? Is he mortal, or immortal? 
"My opponent will tell you that man is a composite creature of three parts -- body, spirit and 
soul; that the spirit and soul mean practically the same thing; that man is begotten and born like 
other animals, but at the time of conception God intervenes in some mysterious way and 
implants in that body a spirit or soul; that that soul is immortal, can never die, lives on forever, 
and is always conscious. 
"If that condition be true it means that God is responsible for every idiot, every born criminal, 
because these are begotten under conditions over which they have absolutely no control. A 
child is begotten by drunken and debauched parents, and at the very moment of conception, 
according to my opponent's position, God intervenes and implants in the creature just 
conceived, an immortal spark. The child is born, necessarily, a depraved creature. It lives on 
earth a while, dies, and must spend eternity in this miserable condition without choice or 
election on its part. Such a theory is wholly unreasonable. God is not unreasonable. The 
creature I have just described is imperfect. God makes nothing imperfect. 'His work is perfect'. 
(Deuteronomy 32-4.) God is in no wise responsible for the life of imperfect or depraved beings. 
BIBLE ANSWER. 
"The Bible declares, 'Man is of the earth earthly.' He is not spiritual. (1 Corinthians 15:45-47.) 
Man is a human being. He is not a spirit being. A spirit hath not flesh and bones. (Luke 24:39.) 
Spirit beings have spiritual bodies. Human, or natural beings, have human or natural bodies. (1 
Corinthians 15:44.) Adam the first man was not spiritual. 'That was not first which is spiritual.' 
(1 Corinthians 15:46.) 
"Man is the highest order of animal life, the crowning glory of God's earthly creation. He is 
composed of body and breath of life, like other animals. The word 'breath' of life is some-times 
spoken of as 'spirit' of life, meaning life principle, or that which animates. The uniting of the 
breath of life with the body produces the soul, or being. The word 'soul' is synonymous to the 
word 'being.' 
"My opponent will not for one moment contend that the body of man is conscious aside from 
the breath of life, nor will he contend that the breath of life is conscious. He will say that it is 
the soul that is conscious after death. We desire to meet this issue squarely. 
THE SOUL. 
"What is the soul? The Scriptures answer: 'The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground 
and breathed into his nostrils the breath of Tile, and man became a living soul.' (Genesis 2:7.) 
 "Was the dust of the earth conscious before formed into a body? No! Was the body conscious 
when formed before it received the breath of life? It was not! Did the breath of life possess 
consciousness? Certainly not! What, then, is conscious? We answer, the soul, or being; the 
creature, the man. 
"Every creature that breathes is a soul. God applied the words 'living soul' to the lower order of 
animals long before the creation of man. (Genesis 1:20 and 30 - margin.) The word 'soul' is 
applied to both men and beasts in Numbers 31:28. 'And levy a tribute unto the Lord of the men 
of war which went out to battle; one soul of five hundred, both of the persons and of the 
beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep.' God, in his word, declares that all die alike and all 
go to the same place, 'For that which befalleth the sons of men befalleth beasts; even one thing 
befalleth them; as the one dieth, so dieth the other; yea, they have all one breath; so that a man 
hath no preeminence above a beast, for all is vanity. All go unto one place; all are of the dust, 
and all turn to dust again.' (Ecclesiastes 3:10, 20.) 
"Can my opponent, in the face of this, deny that the ox is a soul, when the Bible says it is? Will 
my opponent for one moment contend that an ox is conscious after death? 
"A soul is a moving, breathing, sentient being that has senses and exercises the same. No man 
has a soul, but every man is a soul. Mark the distinction between having a thing and being that 
thing! 
PENALTY OF THE LAW. 
"God said to Adam, 'Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge, for in the day that 
thou eatest thereof dying, thou shalt die.' (Genesis 2:17)-margin. If the soul is immortal, then 
God did not mean what he said, because an immortal creature could not be put to death. Was 
this announced penalty of the law to apply to the body only, or to the soul? My opponent will 
contend that the body died and the soul continued to live, but the Bible answers (Ezekiel 18:4). 
'The soul that sinneth, it shall die, and again, in Psalms 89:48, 'What man is he that liveth and 
shall not see death, shall he deliver his soul from the grave?' 
MAN NOT IMMORTAL. 
"Man is a soul. Man dies, therefore the soul dies. There is a distinction between eternal life and 
immortal life. A creature may live eternally and yet not be immortal. Immortality means that 
quality of life not subject to cessation; means that the creature cannot die and God, even, has 
not the power to destroy such an one. Has God power to destroy the soul? Jesus answers, 'Fear 
him who is able to destroy soul and body.' (Matthew 10:28.) Can a soul that is destroyed still 
have consciousness? Impossible! My opponent will not be able to produce even one Scripture 
text which says, 'Man has an immortal soul.' 
THE FIRST LIE. 
"Jesus, who spake with authority, pointed out that Satan is the author of the theory of undieable 
or immortal souls, and that this was the beginning of lies. God had definitely said to man, 'Ye shall surely die.' 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' Satan appeared to Mother Eve and asked, 
'Why do you not eat of the fruit in the midst of Eden?' to which Eve replied, 'God has said, "Ye 
shall not eat thereof lest ye die,'" to which Satan rejoined, 'Ye shall surely not die.' (Genesis 
3:1-5.) Here Satan told the first lie, and from it all other lies have had their birth. In proof of 
this Jesus states, 'Satan was the father of lies, a liar from the beginning and abode not in the 
truth.' (John 8:44.) Again, we read in the Scriptures concerning Satan, 'He is the god of this age. 
The god of this age hath blinded the minds of men lest the light of the glorious gospel should 
shine unto them.' (2 Corinthians 4:4.) From the day of Mother Eve's deception until now, Satan 
has been blinding the minds of men to God's glorious plan by this same falsehood -- there is no 
death, the dead are conscious. The theory that the dead are conscious is not supported by the 
Scriptures, but is based upon Satan's false-hood and the deception he has so successfully 
practiced upon the people. 
WHO IS IMMORTAL? 
"The Bible answers (1 Timothy 6:16), 'God only hath immortality.' There is a wide distinction 
between man in general and one who has become a real Christian. One line of Scriptures 
applies to men in general, and another and different line of Scriptures applies to the real 
followers of Christ. Mark my opponent's argument and see if he rightly divides the word of 
truth and makes this distinction. 
"The New Testament speaks of immortality as a promised reward, not an inherent quality. It is 
the greatest reward that God has to bestow upon his creatures who love and serve him. To the 
Christian, St. Paul says, 'Seek ye immortality.' (Romans 2:7.) A man does not seek for that 
which he already possesses. Again, 'This mortal must put on immortality.' (1 Corinthians 
15:53.) If man already possessed Immortality he would not be looking forward to the future 
when he would receive that which he already possesses. These Scriptures have no reference to 
the world, but to Christians only. The world of mankind will never possess the quality of 
immortality. To the church the promise is made, 'Be thou faithful unto death and I will give 
thee the crown of life.' The highest element of life, immortality. (Revelation 2:10.) 
THE DEAD UNCONSCIOUS. 
"We have shown that man is a soul; that man-soul is subject to death; that it would be 
impossible for a dead soul or being to be conscious while dead. Now we offer some 
corroborative Scriptural proof establishing this fact beyond the question of a doubt, and we 
believe to the complete satisfaction of every one who believes the Bible. 
WITHOUT MEMORY. 
"When a man dies, according to the Bible, he ceases to remember, nor can he give praise to 
God, 'for in death there is no remembrance of thee'; 'in the grave who shall give thee thanks?' 
(Psalms 6:5.) 'Wilt thou shew wonders to the dead? shall the dead arise and praise thee. Shall 
thy loving kindness be declared in the grave or thy faithfulness in destruction?' (Psalms 88:10, 
12.) If these Scriptures be true, then the dead could not be conscious. 
 SPEAK NOT. 
"They also cease speaking. 'The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into 
silence.' Psalms 115-17.) 
NEITHER BREATHE, THINK, FEEL. 
"They also stop breathing, thinking and feeling. 'Thou takest away their breath; they die and 
return to the dust.' (Psalms 104:29.) 'His breath goeth forth, he returneth to the earth; in that 
very day his thoughts perish.' (Psalms 146:4.) A person that cannot think and who knows 
nothing could not be conscious, neither could such an one feel. As an illustration, a man goes to 
the hospital to submit to a serious operation. Before the surgeon begins to use the knife he puts 
his patient under the influence of an anesthetic for the express purpose of producing 
unconsciousness, because he does not wish the patient to feel and thereby suffer pain of the 
operation. 
CEASES TO HATE. 
"We must keep in mind that my opponent and myself have agreed that the Bible is the authority 
by which these questions shall be settled, and mere theory and conjecture should not be 
tolerated. Then let us have some more Bible proof upon the proposition. A dead man ceases to 
love, ceases to hate and ceases to envy. (Ecclesiastes 9:6.) 
"Furthermore, the Scriptures clearly state that he 'knows not anything.' (Ecclesiastes 9:50.) The 
dead stop working; there is no more device and no more scheming. 'Whatsoever thy hand 
findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor 
wisdom, in the grave whither thou goest.' (Ecclesiastes 9:10.) 
"I submit that when a man reaches the point where he cannot remember; cannot give thanks; 
cannot speak; cannot breathe; does not think; has no feeling; neither loves, hates or envies; does 
not work; and knows not anything, he must be actually and completely dead, therefore 
unconscious. 
PERISHED. 
"To perish means to be destroyed; to be cut off; to cease to exist. -- Dr. Strong. Therefore, a 
creature that has perished cannot be conscious anywhere. Does man perish when he dies? Let 
the Scriptures answer. 'For he seeth that wise men die, likewise the fool and the brutish person 
perish, and leave their wealth to others. Their inward thought is, that their houses shall continue 
forever, and their dwelling places to all generations; they call their lands after their own names. 
Nevertheless, man being in honor abideth not: he is like the beasts that perish.' (Psalms 
49:10,12.) 
 WHY MEN DIE. 
"It is a principle of God's law that every perfect, righteous creature is entitled to life. It follows 
that every unrighteous creature has no legal right to life. God enforced his judgment against 
Adam in a gradual manner, viz -- by forcing Adam out of Eden, where the food was perfect, 
and forcing him to obtain his food or sustenance from the unfinished earth, which brought forth 
or produced poisonous foods. As he partook of these poisonous foods, disease was taken into 
his blood and the death process began and was gradual until he was completely dead. Adam 
was legally dead when driven from Eden, actually and completely dead 930 years later. 
"Adam was given power, before he sinned, to transmit the spark of life, or life principle, to his 
children. The judgment of God deprived him of his legal right to life and that judgment pursued 
the power of reproduction; in other words, his offspring were begotten under the disability that 
their father was laboring under, viz.: without legal right to life, and the Father Adam 
transmitted to his offspring the same poison or disease that was in his system. The perfect man 
Adam begot no children. His children he begot after he was under the sentence of death, and 
therefore he transmitted to all of his offspring the disease in his own body. Consequently, by 
operation of God's law, all of Adam's children inherited death and were born legally dead, or 
without a legal right to life. In proof of this we read, in Psalms 51:5, 'Behold, I was shapen in 
iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me'; and again (Romans 5:12). 'As by the 
disobedience of one man sin entered the world, and death by sin, therefore death passed upon 
all men, for all have sinned.' It follows that every man that has died, died because of the 
judgment that was justly placed against Adam and which by inheritance came upon his 
offspring. Every man thus justly dying would, of necessity, remain dead forever unless God 
had made some provision for his redemption and resurrection. 
REDEMPTION. 
"In John 3:16 we read; 'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that 
whosoever believeth on him should not perish, but have everlasting life.' 
"I submit that these words of the Master conclusively prove that the dead are unconscious until 
the awakening to the resurrection. A creature that perishes could not have consciousness, and in 
this Scripture the statement is made that all would perish forever without the provision God 
made for redemption through Jesus Christ. 
"My opponent must concede, if he believes the Bible, that none would be saved without 
believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. This Scripture is positive that all of us would perish. 
"Thus we see we are not limited to the Old Testament to prove that the dead are unconscious 
until the awakening to the resurrection. 
MORE PROOF. 
"St. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15:16, 18, says: 'If the dead rise not, then Christ is not raised, and if 
Christ be not raised your faith is vain, ye are yet in your sins; then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.' Mark, he says that even Christians are perished, utterly 
destroyed, if there be no resurrection. They are already perished, because dead, and their future 
life is absolutely dependent upon the resurrection. 
"Now I ask my opponent to answer this question: If the dead are perished unless there is a 
resurrection, how would it be possible for that creature to be conscious prior to the time of 
being awakened to the resurrection? Resurrection really means re-creation -- bringing again to 
perfect condition of life. 
WHY RESURRECTION POSSIBLE? 
"While we must leave for a subsequent argument a more detailed discussion of the philosophy 
of the ransom sacrifice, it is necessary here to call attention to some of the cardinal points 
thereof. 
"The perfect man Adam sinned, and thereby forfeited all his right to life. Before his sin the 
entire human race, unborn, was in his loins; that is to say, he had the power to produce the race 
and in this sense the whole race had a life-standing in Adam. When he sinned all his rights 
were lost, hence all of his offspring were born legally dead. The apostle emphasizes this fact 
when he says; 'In Adam all die.' 
"God's law provided that his judgment might be satisfied by the voluntary death of another 
equal to Adam, 'a life for a life.' (Exodus 21:23.) Jesus partook of flesh and blood for the very 
purpose of redeeming man. (Hebrews 2:9.) He stated (Mark 10:45) that he came to give his life 
a ransom (corresponding price). By his death and resurrection from the dead the Lord provided 
the ransom price for Adam and his offspring. This was an absolute guarantee that the entire 
human race, in God's due time, would be released from the condemnation of death and 
awakened to a resurrection. Because the penalty of sin is death and death means cessation of 
life, it was necessary for the man, Christ Jesus, to die in order to redeem mankind from that 
death sentence; and the fact of his death and resurrection, the apostle argues, is conclusive 
proof that all the dead shall come forth. 
DEATH -- SLEEP. 
"Since God has made provision for the awakening of the dead to the resurrection, the Bible 
frequently speaks of death as sleep. Sleep is a symbol of death, and the word is used in that 
sense. A man lies down to sleep and we say he will wake again. And so we say with reference 
to the dead -- 'He shall awake and come again.' As the Prophet Jeremiah beautifully states the 
matter (Jeremiah 31:15-16), 'Thus sayeth the Lord, a voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, 
and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, 
because they were not. Thus sayeth the Lord, refrain thy voice from weeping and thine eyes 
from tears; for thy work shall be rewarded saith the Lord; and they shall come again from the 
land of the enemy. Thy children shall come again to their own border." This Scripture proves 
that the dead were out of existence but there was hope for a resurrection. 
 "Both the Old and New Testaments abound with expressions referring to the dead as asleep. 
We read, 1 Kings 2:10, that 'David slept with his fathers and was buried in the city of David.' 
St. Peter says, 'The fathers fell asleep. (2 Peter 3:4.) St. Paul, speaking of those who had seen 
Jesus in the flesh, said, 'The greater part remain until this day, but some are fallen asleep.' (1 
Corinthians 15:6.) Again, 'I would not have you ignorant, brethren, concerning them that are 
asleep. Them that sleep in Jesus God will bring forth by Jesus at the resurrection.' (1 
Thessalonians 4:3-14.) 
SLEEPING -- UNCONSCIOUS. 
"Who ever heard of one sleeping soundly and being conscious at the same time? Sleep means 
suspension of the voluntary exercise of the functions of the body and mind. Sleep is used as a 
symbol of death. The reality is more pronounced than the symbol. If the symbol represents 
unconsciousness, the reality does even more so. 
"The death sleep is so absolutely a period of unconsciousness that the awakening one will have 
no knowledge of the lapse of time or the transpiring of events. Now we will prove the truth of 
this statement by the Lord Jesus' own testimony. In John, 11th chapter, verses 1 to 44 (John 
11:1-44), we find this proof, which we paraphrase. Lazarus lived with his two sisters at 
Bethany. Jesus was often entertained at this home and taught the members of the household. 
Lazarus became sick. Word was sent to Jesus of Lazarus' illness, but after he heard it Jesus 
remained in the same place for two days longer. He was preparing to teach mankind a great 
lesson concerning the dead and how they shall be awakened out of the sleep of death. At the 
end of the two days, speaking to his disciples, he said, 'Our friend Lazarus sleepeth.' His 
disciples replied, 'Lord if he sleepeth he doeth well, but Jesus spake of his death, but they 
thought he had spoken of taking rest in sleep. Then said Jesus unto them plainly, 'Lazarus is 
dead.' Thomas suggested that they go to Bethany at once. Jesus and his disciples went. Arriving 
at Bethany they found that Lazarus had been dead and buried for four days. Jesus here 
performed a great miracle, which testified in no uncertain terms as to the condition of the dead 
and proves beyond all doubt that the dead are wholly unconscious until the awakening to the 
resurrection. Mark what he did! He did not call Lazarus out of heaven, nor out of purgatory, nor 
a lake of fire and brimstone, but after giving thanks to God he went to the grave, which was a 
cave in the hillside, and cried with a loud voice, 'Lazarus, come forth,' and the dead came forth. 
"Let my opponent answer this question if he will: If Lazarus was at all conscious during the 
four days that he was dead and in the grave, why is there not some proof of it some-where to be 
found in the Bible? Jesus was here showing how the dead are to be awakened out of the sleep 
of death. It was of the greatest importance, if Lazarus had been conscious, that some proof of 
that fact might have been recorded. The fact that nothing is said about his being conscious, 
taken in con-junction with numerous other Scriptures that show that the dead are wholly 
unconscious, is conclusive proof that Lazarus was unconscious for four days while dead and 
likewise conclusive proof that all the dead are unconscious until the moment of awakening. 
 THE PROPOSITION. 
"The proposition under discussion as stated is a clear admission that the dead are unconscious 
for the reason it assumes -- that there is to be an awakening. Mark the words thereof, 'that the 
dead are unconscious from the moment of death until the moment of awakening to the 
resurrection of the dead.' If the dead were already conscious it follows that they would already 
be awake and therefore there could be no awakening; hence, my opponent admits by the 
statement of the proposition that his contention is wrong. 
"Jesus points out that all the dead are to be awakened to the resurrection. (John 5:28-29.) 
Awakened from where? we ask. From heaven? Purgatory? An intermediate state? Hell, fire and 
brimstone, or where? Let my opponent answer, but before he answers let God's word answer, 
which says, "They that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake.' (Daniel 12:2.) 
WHAT IS TO BE AWAKENED. 
"What, then, is to be awakened to the resurrection, the soul, body or what? My opponent will 
tell you that the soul is still alive, therefore awake; hence could not be awakened. To be 
consistent, he will be compelled to say that it is the body thatis to be awakened. Then we ask 
him, if the soul is alive without a body and is enjoying life, and the same old body that it once 
had is to be awakened, why cumber it with that body? Such a contention is wholly 
unreasonable. These old bodies have given us a great deal of trouble. Most men who live to 
maturity, or beyond that, have bodies that are very ugly, and I am sure it would not be a joy to 
think about carrying around such a body to endless ages. 
"But how absurd the proposition that it is this old body that is to be awakened! How would that 
body ever be gotten together? To illustrate: A man dies and is buried. Later an orange tree is 
planted upon his grave. The roots, running down into the grave, absorb all the chemical 
elements of that body and these, in turn, are transmitted to the bud that forms the fruit. The fruit 
matures. Some of it is fed to pigs and these are shipped away and consumed by man, other 
parts of the oranges are shipped to different parts of the earth, and thus the chemical elements 
of that body are scattered everywhere. The further we pursue this illustration, the more absurd 
bodily resurrection seems. We are not surprised, then, that St. Paul says, in 1 Corinthians 
15:35-38, 'Some men will say, how are the dead raised up and with what body to they come? 
Thou fool; that which thou sowest is not quickened except it die, and that which thou sowest, 
thou sowest not the body that shall be * * but God giveth it a body as it pleaseth him.' It is not 
at all the body that is to be resurrected, and this is clearly shown by the words above quoted, 
'God giveth it a body.' What is the 'it?' Mark you, 'it' is that which is resurrected. If my 
opponent says the body is resurrected and then God gives it a body, it follows that it has two 
bodies. 
"When we get a clear understanding of God's plan, this Scripture is entirely clarified. God 
formed man of the dust of the earth, breathed into his nostrils, and man became a living soul. 
The soul was the it. In proof of that mark the words 'The soul that sinneth, it shall die.' 
Therefore, God made the soul the it. The soul, it dies, and St. Paul says the soul is resurrected, 
and God gives it -- the soul, the being, the man, the creature -- a body as it pleaseth him. And then, in the context, he points out that some will receive spiritual bodies and others natural 
bodies. 
"We submit, upon the whole, that the Scriptures clearly teach that man is a soul; that the soul is 
mortal, subject to God's law; that the soul means man, the creature; the soul (man, creature) 
dies, and would forever remain out of existence, except that God has made provision for 
redemption, awakening and resurrection, and the Scriptures with one accord conclusively prove 
that the soul is unconscious from the moment of death to the moment of awakening to the 
resurrection. 
"Keeping clearly in mind these great truths, the debate tomorrow evening will demonstrate, 
likewise clearly, that God is not a fiend, as has been charged, but a great God of love, justice, 
wisdom and power. 
RICH MAN AND LAZARUS. 
"My opponent will cite the rich man and Lazarus in proof that the dead are conscious after 
death and before awakening to the resurrection. A careful examination of this text shows that it 
does not sustain his theory. I am going to ask him now, when he does cite that text, to answer 
this question, Is that scriptural statement to be taken literally or symbolically? Was Jesus 
describing a reality that then existed, or was he giving a parable to teach some lesson? I don't 
care which way he answers it, he will be in a hole. If he answers, 'It is to be taken literally,' then 
you will see the utter absurdity it expresses. If he answers. 'It is a parable,' then it absolutely 
disproves his position. 
MOUNT TRANSFIGURATION. 
"Another text my opponent will doubtless use is that concerning Moses and Elijah on the 
Mount of Transfiguration, to prove that the dead are conscious while dead. But if you will read 
the context it will readily be seen that Jesus plainly states that this was a vision. Note, he said, 
as they come down from the mountain, 'Tell the vision to no man until the Son of Man is risen 
from the dead.' (1 Corinthians 15:20; Colossians 1:18.) Moses and Elijah are yet dead. 
(Hebrews 11:39.) What really transpired on the mount is this, as the text shows, Jesus caused 
these disciples to see a vision for the purpose of teaching them a lesson. Moses represented the 
faithful ones of the Jewish age and who will be members of the earthly phase of Christ's 
kingdom. Elijah represented the faithful ones of the Gospel age, who will be members of the 
heavenly phase of Messiah's kingdom. These two phases of the kingdom I will especially set 
forth in my argument on Friday evening. 
MOSES AND THE RESURRECTION. 
"Brother Troy will insist that Jesus taught that the dead are alive when he said, 'Now that the 
dead are raised, even Moses showed at the bush, when he calleth the Lord the God of Abraham 
and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living, 
for all live unto Him.' (Luke 20:37-38.) But mark, Jesus' words are, 'Now that the dead are 
raised up.' Moses, Abraham and the other prophets were dead at the time Jesus spoke, but since God's plan provides for their resurrection he spoke of things that are to be as though they were. 
(Romans 4:17.) All live from God's standpoint, for the reason he has made provision for their 
resurrection, not that they are actually alive. Death, therefore, is spoken of, as we have shown, 
as sleep. The emphatic Diaglott gives this text the proper rendering and makes it plain. It says, 
'But that the dead arise, even Moses has declared.' That is to say, Jesus was producing the 
argument that Moses had shown that there is to be a resurrection of the dead, and that argument 
was in answer to those who claimed that there was to be no resurrection. 
THIEF IN PARADISE. 
"My opponent would have you believe that the thief 
went to heaven the very day that Jesus was crucified 
upon the cross, because Jesus said, 'Verily, I say unto 
you, today thou shalt be with me in Paradise.' Does my 
opponent believe that the thief went to heaven before 
the Lord Jesus got there? I am sure you do not. We 
know that Jesus was dead for three days and after his 
resurrection he stated to the women that sought to take 
hold upon him, 'Touch me not, for I have not yet 
ascended to my Father.' Forty days later he ascended 
into haven. Where was the thief all that time? We 
answer, the thief was dead, is still dead and will remain 
dead until the time of the resurrection. 
Paradise does not mean heaven; it means the restored 
earth, the proof of which we will give in our Friday 
evening argument. The reason this text is misleading is 
that, when translated, the punctuation mark, the comma, 
was placed after the word 'thee,' making it read, 'Verily, 
I say unto thee, today thou shalt be with me in 
Paradise.' The Greek language had no punctuation 
marks; the translators had no authority to put this 
comma where they did. Put the emphasis where it 
belongs and this text reads, 'Verily, I say unto thee 
today (that is to say, I am telling you now, this dark day) 
Attorney J. F. Rutherford, Who Declares Dead Do Not Suffer. 
 thou shalt be with me in Paradise,' meaning, when I come into the kingdom and establish the 
paradise, of earth. 
"My opponent cites 2 Corinthians 5:6 for the purpose of showing that the dead are conscious 
while not in the body of flesh. He does not properly apply this Scripture. The words are not 
spoken concerning the world in general, but applied only to the faithful Christians. These, at the 
time of consecration and acceptance by the Lord, are begotten to a heavenly life and thereby 
become new creatures and from God's standpoint are counted dead as human beings. (1 Peter 
1:3, 4; Colossians 3:3, 4.) In the latter Scriptures, St. Paul states that the new creature receives 
his life at the second coming of Christ Jesus when he partakes of the first resurrection. 
"Now, while living in this old body, the Christian is absent from the Lord. And after death and 
until the second coming of the Lord, and therefore until the resurrection, the Christian dead are 
completely out of existence except in the memory Jehovah and are spoken of as 'naked,' that is 
to say, in the grave awaiting the resurrection, and therefore absent from the Lord. But St. Paul 
expresses his great desire to be invested or clothed with the new spiritual body and thus be at 
home, the heavenly home with Christ Jesus the Lord. He did not expect this to take place as 
soon as he died, but at the second coming of Christ, he expressed himself to Timothy, saying: 
'The time of departure is at hand. Henceforth there is a crown of righteousness laid up for me 
which that righteous judge shall give to at that day, and not to me only, but to all who love his 
appearing. (2 Timothy 4:7, 8.).

Wednesday 11 November 2015

Why educate when you can propagandize?

"Scientific Literacy" with Grandmother Fish?
Sarah Chaffee November 10, 2015 12:21 PM



The right question isn't when, but how you should introduce a child to evolution. In a recent article on NPR's 13.7 Cosmos and Culture blog, Barbara King praises a new book about common ancestry written for 3-7 year olds. Unfortunately, Grandmother Fish is another attempt to present evolution as dogma, not as a scientific hypothesis.

The book begins:

This is our Grandmother Fish. She lived a long, long, long, long, long time ago. She could wiggle and swim fast. Can you wiggle? And she had jaws to chomp with. Can you chomp?

There are many problems here -- and all of them prevent students from truly learning science. The story format, claiming to recount the past, does not lend itself to critical analysis. Darwinian evolution is presented as a fact, without any hint of scientific dissent. The book doesn't leave room for dissent either. It just encourages agreement with evolution by asking children to mimic actions they have in common with supposed ancestors.

The end result is that preschoolers come away identifying with "grandmother" fish, reptile, mammal, and ape. King calls this progress, saying, "Grandmother Fish is a fun way to start children down a path of scientific literacy."

No, pre-conditioning young minds to accept evolution uncritically isn't fostering scientific literacy. As CSC Research Coordinator Casey Luskin has noted:

Everyone wants to be "scientifically literate," but the Darwin lobby pressures people by redefining "scientific literacy" to mean "acceptance of evolution" rather than "an independent mind who understands science and forms its own informed opinions."

Discovery Institute advocates presenting evolution objectively. Students should learn both the scientific strengths and weaknesses of neo-Darwinism. Our Science Education Policy says, "Evolution should be taught as a scientific theory that is open to critical scrutiny, not as a sacred dogma that can't be questioned."

It's worth noting here that on the issue of common ancestry, intelligent design proponents hold a range of views. Some accept common ancestry, while others do not. However, all would agree that the topic should be presented critically, with a discussion of the scientific arguments both for and against.


Teaching critical examination of the issues, not spoon-feeding young children neo-Darwinism, is the best way to promote scientific literacy.

Tripling up on the doubt.

Three More Problematic Findings About the Cambrian Explosion
Evolution News & Views November 11, 2015 3:01 AM 

Whenever you find papers and articles dealing with the Cambrian fossil record in the usual science journals, there are commonalities: more evidence of exceptional preservation without fossil ancestors, and complete silence on the doubts this naturally prompts. Here are three more that follow that template.

Insignificant Bioturbation

Many fossils become disturbed over time by burrowing organisms, a phenomenon called bioturbation. Gingras and Konhauser, writing for Nature Geoscience News & Views, analyze a recent study that sought to determine the extent of bioturbation in Cambrian strata. The answer is brief:

The Cambrian evolution of burrowing species is thought to have facilitated sediment mixing. However, sediment fabrics suggest that bioturbation remained insignificant until the appearance of more efficient sediment mixers in the Silurian.
This should be surprising, given that worms and other phyla capable of burrowing appear in the explosion (notice they rebadge it as the "Cambrian evolution"), and the sea floor is generally a soft environment. "A protracted development of marine bioturbation challenges long-held views of the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition," they say. It also implies that worm burrows did not exist as trace fossils in the late Ediacaran as an attempt to locate complex animals long before the explosion (Meyer, Darwin's Doubt, p. 85).

The authors of the referenced paper in Nature Geoscience leave it as a mystery why significant "bulldozing" by burrowing animals did not occur until 120 million years later. What it means practically is that the Cambrian fossils were left largely undisturbed for our viewing today, as the next article shows.

Exceptional Preservation

Another paper about Cambrian fossils appeared in Current Biology (see previous coverage here and here). This one is about "Preservational Pathways of Corresponding Brains of a Cambrian Euarthropod," suggesting that it's going to show brains of a really complex animal, a "true" or "good" arthropod -- you know, those complex animals with jointed appendages, brains, and a digestive tract? (insects, spiders, crabs, etc.). Sure enough, the color pictures jump out at you: brown stains at the heads of Chinese arthropod fossils are the actual remains of this animal's central nervous system (CNS), revealing "tripartite brain organization, cephalic nerves, and optic neuropils." Earlier finds showed some of these things, but the new fossils remove all doubt.

The record of arthropod body fossils is traceable back to the "Cambrian explosion," marked by the appearance of most major animal phyla. Exceptional preservation provides crucial evidence for panarthropod early radiation. However, due to limited representation in the fossil record of internal anatomy, particularly the CNS, studies usually rely on exoskeletal and appendicular morphology. Recent studies show that despite extreme morphological disparities, euarthropod CNS evolution appears to have been remarkably conservative.
Let's parse this opener and translate the euphemisms. First, notice the quote marks around "Cambrian explosion," a subtle hint that the term is controversial. It's not. They state clearly that it is "marked by the appearance of most major animal phyla." Panarthropoda is a taxon that combines arthropods with tardigrades and onycophorans. The sentence means that yes, lots of different arthropods appear throughout the fossil record, revealing "extreme morphological disparities," i.e. outward differences.

Yet these Chinese specimens show that the brains are conservative--not that they vote Republican, but that CNS structures throughout the panarthropod collection are similar, not showing extensive evolution. They're not just conservative; they are "remarkably conservative." In terms of general body plan, it's a picture of sudden appearance and then stasis for the rest of time -- not exactly what Darwin hoped the fossils would demonstrate.

You can read this open-access paper and appreciate the delicate features preserved in these fossils. The authors present a theory of taphonomy (the study of how things fossilize) to explain what they see.

Foremost among objections is the lack of taphonomic explanation for exceptional preservation of a tissue that some see as too prone to decay to be fossilized. Here we describe newly discovered specimens of the Chengjiang euarthropod Fuxianhuia protensa with fossilized brains revealing matching profiles, allowing rigorous testing of the reproducibility of cerebral structures. Their geochemical analyses provide crucial insights of taphonomic pathways for brain preservation, ranging from uniform carbon compressions to complete pyritization, revealing that neural tissue was initially preserved as carbonaceous film and subsequently pyritized. This mode of preservation is consistent with the taphonomic pathways of gross anatomy, indicating that no special mode is required for fossilization of labile neural tissue.
These creatures not only appeared suddenly; they were buried so quickly and completely, they left brown stains in the rock preserving details of the brain and CNS. Since there wasn't significant bioturbation, we have the imprint of its brain -- including the original carbon film, overlaid with pyrite, leaving impressions clear enough for the scientists to draw conclusions about the "conservative" evolution of arthropod brains. Is it any wonder there is almost no discussion of evolution in the rest of the paper?

Amazingly, some of the brains retain their original carbon without any pyrite. The authors believe the carbon has been degraded into carbon chains, but accounting for any organic material after 517 million years requires postulating highly unusual circumstances. In addition, some external tissues, such as cuticle from the exoskeleton, have been preserved with their yellow color. Examples of Chengjiang fossils are shown in the color plates of Meyer's book Darwin's Doubt. They really are breathtakingly beautiful fossils.

Most importantly, these fossils show that "a tripartite brain comprising three pre-stomodeal neuromeres had evolved by the early Cambrian" -- better, it appeared in the early Cambrian without any evidence of evolution before or after. They restate this important fact: "These features demonstrate that by Cambrian Stage 3 (circa 517 million years ago) arthropods had already acquired CNSs generally corresponding to those of extant taxa." Darwin wept.

Molecular Biology

The third recent article, this one from the University of Leicester, reinforces what we've previously said about molecular evidence. Scientists may claim that the common ancestor of the Cambrian animals resides way back in the Precambrian, but without fossils, it's at best indirect inference. It's also a circular argument, claiming that the differences are caused by evolution, and then claiming they demonstrate evolution.

The spinning begins in the first sentences, but watch the word "conserved":

Researchers at Universities of Leicester and Warwick discover early conserved DNA sequences from almost 700 million years ago.
700 million year-old DNA sequences from ancient animals have been unearthed by researchers at the Universities of Leicester and Warwick, shedding new light on our earliest animal ancestors and how they influenced modern species -- including the sponge.

Unearthed? Did they go on a fossil dig? No, they sat in their labs digging through genes. Most interesting are the genes that didn't evolve for hundreds of millions of years.

The ancient sequences were found to be present in a wide variety of modern animals including insects, mammals, reptiles, jellyfish, and even our most distant animal ancestor, the sponge.....
Dr Tauber of the Department of Genetics at the University of Leicester said: "We are extremely excited about identifying these ancient DNA elements. Their conservation indicates that they serve an important function, and there is already some experimental evidence to suggest that this is indeed the case.

This non-evolving genetic evidence does nothing to explain its sudden appearance, whether in the Cambrian or 200 million years prior to the Cambrian explosion. Without fossils, furthermore, they have no way to calibrate the molecular clock. The record of the rocks should take priority.

No First Aid for Explosion Victims

So, we find complex animals with stains of their brains preserved in the rocks -- brains that look just like modern arthropod brains. The fossils were not disturbed by worms that existed alongside the arthropods, but apparently did not exist earlier in the Ediacaran. And then we see conserved genes that they say haven't evolved for 700 million years.


Darwin still has good reason to doubt, and his readers have good reason to doubt Darwin.

Tuesday 10 November 2015

The Watchtower Society's commentary on the bible's view of kingship.

KING:

A sovereign who has authority to rule over others. Jehovah is the supreme King, possessing unlimited power and authority. The kings of Judah were subordinate kings who represented His sovereignty on earth. Like them, Jesus Christ is a subordinate King, but with far greater power than those earthly kings, because Jehovah has put him in the position of ruling the universe. (Php 2:9-11) Jesus Christ has therefore been made “King of kings and Lord of lords.”—Re 19:16; see JESUS CHRIST; KINGDOM.

Early Kings. Among earthly rulers a king is a male sovereign invested with supreme authority over a city, a tribe, a nation, or an empire, and he usually rules for life. Nimrod, a descendant of Ham, was the first human king of Bible record. He ruled over a kingdom that included several cities in Mesopotamia. He was a rebel against Jehovah’s sovereignty.—Ge 10:6, 8-10.

Canaan and the countries surrounding it had kings in the days of Abraham, long before the Israelites did. (Ge 14:1-9) Kings are also found from the earliest times among the Philistines, Edomites, Moabites, Midianites, Ammonites, Syrians, Hittites, Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, and Romans. Many of these kings ruled over limited domains such as a city-state. Adoni-bezek, for example, boasted that he had conquered 70 of such kings.—Jg 1:7.

The first human king noted in the Bible as being righteous was Melchizedek, king-priest of Salem. (Ge 14:18) Aside from Jesus Christ, who is King and High Priest combined, Melchizedek is the only God-approved ruler to have held both offices. The apostle Paul points out that God used Melchizedek as a typical representation of Christ. (Heb 7:1-3; 8:1, 6) No other faithful servant of God, not even Noah, attempted to be a king, and God appointed none of them until Saul was anointed at His direction.

Israelite Kings. Initially Jehovah ruled Israel as an invisible King through various agencies, first through Moses and later through human Judges from Othniel to Samson. (Jg 8:23; 1Sa 12:12) Eventually the Israelites clamored for a king in order to be like the nations around them. (1Sa 8:5-8, 19) Under the legal provision embodied in the Law covenant for a divinely appointed human king, Jehovah appointed Saul of the tribe of Benjamin through the prophet Samuel. (De 17:14-20; 1Sa 9:15, 16; 10:21, 24) Because of disobedience and presumptuousness, Saul lost Jehovah’s favor and the opportunity to provide a dynasty of kings. (1Sa 13:1-14; 15:22-28) Turning then to the tribe of Judah, Jehovah selected David the son of Jesse to be the next king of Israel. (1Sa 16:13; 17:12) For faithfully supporting Jehovah’s worship and laws, David was privileged to establish a dynasty of kings. (2Sa 7:15, 16) The Israelites reached a peak of prosperity under the reign of Solomon, a son of David.—1Ki 4:25; 2Ch 1:15.

During the reign of Solomon’s son Rehoboam, the nation was split into two kingdoms. The first king of the northern, ten-tribe kingdom, generally spoken of as Israel, was Jeroboam the son of Nebat of the tribe of Ephraim. (1Ki 11:26; 12:20) Disobediently he turned the worship of his people to golden calves. For this sin he came under Jehovah’s disfavor. (1Ki 14:10, 16) A total of 20 kings ruled in the northern kingdom from 997 to 740 B.C.E., beginning with Jeroboam and ending with Hoshea the son of Elah. In the southern kingdom, Judah, 19 kings reigned from 997 to 607 B.C.E., beginning with Rehoboam and ending with Zedekiah. (Athaliah, a usurper of the throne and not a king, is not counted.)—See BURIAL, BURIAL PLACES; CHRONOLOGY.

Divinely appointed representatives. Jehovah appointed the kings of his people, and they were to act as his royal agents, sitting, not on their own thrones, but on “the throne of the kingship of Jehovah,” that is, as representatives of his theocratic rule. (1Ch 28:5; 29:23) Contrary to the practice of some Oriental peoples in those days, the nation of Israel did not deify their kings. All the kings of Judah were regarded as being the anointed ones of Jehovah, although the record does not specifically state that each individual king was literally anointed with oil when he ascended the throne. Literal anointing oil is recorded as being used when a new dynasty was established, when the throne was disputed in David’s old age as well as in the days of Jehoash, and when an older son was passed over for a younger son at the time Jehoahaz was enthroned. (1Sa 10:1; 16:13; 1Ki 1:39; 2Ki 11:12; 23:30, 31, 34, 36) It seems likely, nevertheless, that such anointing was the regular practice.

The king of Judah was chief administrator of national affairs, as a shepherd of the people. (Ps 78:70-72) He generally took the lead in battle. (1Sa 8:20; 2Sa 21:17; 1Ki 22:29-33) He also acted as the higher court in the judiciary, except that the high priest would consult Jehovah for decisions on some matters of state and on certain matters in which the decision was very difficult or evidence at the mouth of witnesses was insufficient.—1Ki 3:16-28.

Kingly restraints. The restraints placed upon the king in the exercise of his authority were his own fear of God, the law of God, which he was bound to obey, and the persuasive influence of the prophets and the priests as well as the advisory counsel of the older men. He was required to write for himself a copy of the Law and to read in it all the days of his life. (De 17:18, 19) He was, as Jehovah’s special servant and representative, responsible to Jehovah. There were, sad to relate, many Judean kings who broke through these restraints and ruled despotically and wickedly.—1Sa 22:12, 13, 17-19; 1Ki 12:12-16; 2Ch 33:9.

Religious leader. Although the king was prevented by law from being a priest, he was supposed to be the chief nonpriestly supporter of Jehovah’s worship. At times the king blessed the nation in Jehovah’s name and represented the people in prayer. (2Sa 6:18; 1Ki 8:14, 22, 54, 55) Besides being responsible for safeguarding the religious life of the people from idolatrous intrusions, he had the authority to dismiss an unfaithful high priest, as King Solomon did when High Priest Abiathar supported Adonijah’s seditious attempt to take the throne.—1Ki 1:7; 2:27.

Wives and property. The marriage and family customs of the Judean kings included the practice of having a plurality of wives and concubines, although the Law stipulated that the king was not to multiply wives to himself. (De 17:17) The concubines were considered to be crown property and were passed on to the successor to the throne along with the rights and property of the king. To marry or take possession of one of the deceased king’s concubines was tantamount to publishing a claim to the throne. Hence, Absalom’s having relations with the concubines of his father, King David, and Adonijah’s requesting as wife Abishag, David’s nurse and companion in his old age, were equivalent to claims on the throne. (2Sa 16:21, 22; 1Ki 2:15-17, 22) These were treasonable acts.

Aside from the king’s personal estate, spoils of war, and gifts (1Ch 18:10), other sources of revenue were developed. These included special taxation of the produce of the land for the royal table, tribute from subjugated kingdoms, toll on traveling merchants passing through the land, and commercial ventures, such as the trading fleets of Solomon.—1Ki 4:7, 27, 28; 9:26-28; 10:14, 15.

Instability of Northern Kingdom. In the northern kingdom of Israel the principle of hereditary succession was observed except when it was interfered with by assassination or revolt. The practice of false religion kept the northern kingdom in a constant state of unrest that contributed to frequent assassinations of its kings and usurpation of the throne. Only two dynasties lasted more than two generations, those of Omri and Jehu. Not being under the Davidic kingdom covenant, none of the kings of the northern kingdom sat on “the throne of the kingship of Jehovah” as the anointed of Jehovah.—1Ch 28:5.

Gentile Kings and Subordinate Kings. Babylonian kings were officially consecrated as monarchs over all the Babylonian Empire by grasping the hand of the golden image of Marduk. This was done by Cyrus the Great in order to gain control over the Babylonian Empire without having to conquer the entire empire by military action.

Other kings came to their thrones through appointment by a higher king, such as the one who conquered the territory. It was a frequent practice for kings to rule conquered domains through tributary native kings of lesser rank. By this process Herod the Great became a tributary king of Rome over Judea (Mt 2:1), and Aretas the king of the Nabataeans was confirmed by Rome in his tributary kingdom.—2Co 11:32.


Non-Israelite kings were less accessible to their subjects than those who ruled God’s people. The Israelite kings evidently mingled quite freely with their people. The Gentile kings were often very remote. To enter the inner court of the Persian king without express permission automatically made that one liable to death unless the king gave his specific approval by extending his scepter, as was done with Esther. (Es 4:11, 16) The Roman emperor, however, was available for audience on the appeal of a Roman citizen from a decision made by a lower judge, but only after a process of going through many lower officials.—Ac 25:11, 12.

Gamesmanship trumps sportsmanship?


Design in the line of fire.

A bedtime story.

Plate tectonics may have driven the evolution of life on Earth
July 16, 2015 by Ross Large And John Long, The Conversation.


When Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution by natural selection in 1859, the world hadn't even heard of plate tectonics. The notion that continents drifted on molten rock currents deep in the Earth's mantle was unimaginable.

So it would have come as a shock to Darwin to think the movement of the Earth's continental plates could have been a major driver of evolutionary change in all life.
In our research, published this month in Gondwana Research, we suggest that the regular collision of tectonic plates over the past 700 million years has been a prime driver of evolutionary change on Earth.
The essentials for life
We used laser technology housed in the Earth Science laboratories at the University of Tasmania to analyse more than 4,000 pyrite grains from seafloor mudstone samples collected from around the globe.
This enabled us to determine how concentrations of trace elements in the oceans have varied over the 700 million years. Trace elements included copper, zinc, phosphorus, cobalt and selenium, which are necessary for nearly all life – from marine phytoplankton through to humans – to function.

The most surprising finding was that there were certain periods in Earth's history when nutrient trace elements were highly enriched in the oceans, and other periods when levels of these critical trace elements were very low.
The nutrient-rich periods promoted rapid plankton growth in the short term, and this appears to correlate with periods of increased evolutionary change. An example of this is the rapid rise in trace elements preceding the Ediacaran (635 to 542 million years ago) and Cambrian (541 to 485 mya) periods, a time when multicellular animal life took off in a big way.
The Cambrian explosion, around 540 million years ago, is when most major groups of living animals appeared. This corresponds to a time when essential trace elements were peaking in the oceans, thus nutrient levels were very high.
The nutrient-poor periods caused depletion of plankton and promoted a slow-down in rates of diversification and ultimately could have played a role in three major mass extinction events. These occurred at the end of the Ordovician, Devonian and Triassic periods.
Although several possible explanations are given for these extinctions events, depletion in oceanic trace elements might be another plausible factor. Work is currently underway demonstrating that these events are tied to rapid declines in certain essential trace elements, particularly selenium.
Plate tectonics and nutrient cycles
Nutrients in the oceans ultimately come from weathering and erosion of rocks on thecontinents. Weathering breaks down the minerals in the rocks and releases thenutrient trace elements, which nourish life. Thus when weathering and erosion rates increase for extended periods, more nutrients are supplied to the oceans.
In the long term of geological history, erosion rates rise dramatically duringmountain building events caused by the gradual collision of tectonic plates.
Geologists have known since the 1960s that collisions of tectonic plates lead to the formation of huge mountain ranges. The Himalayas were formed when India, drifting northwards after splitting off from the supercontinent of Gondwana, slammed into Asia and pushed up the Tibetan Plateau. These collisions are called called orogenic events and their timing through Earth's history is now well established.
Continued erosion eventually depletes the surface of nutrients, causing a drop in the ocean's nutrients. This might have led to extinction events in the seas.
This is the first time nutrient trace element curves have been developed that demonstrate the relationship between tectonic collisions and the generation of cycles of nutrients.
While the link between these nutrient cycles as drivers of evolution and factors in mass extinction events remains to be proven, it really makes us think about evolution in a broad sense. Plate tectonics and evolution both operate on the same time scale of millions of years, and it seems logical that they could be causally related.
The relationship between increased nutrients in the oceans with bursts of evolutionary change are clearly correlated for the early part of the cycles, but less clear is the correlation with the evolution of advanced land animals.
Life out of the oceans
The origin of the first land animals, tetrapods about 370 million years ago, corresponds with a decrease in oceanic nutrients and a series of mass extinction events in the oceans. This could explain why certain sarcopterygian fishes with robust limbs left the seas when they did in order to leave the nutrient-poor ocean and make out on land.
But the first appearance of dinosaurs and mammals in the early Triassic, about 225 million years ago, has no correlation with trace element abundance.
Perhaps the cycles pertain mainly to biodiversity in the oceans. There is certainly a close correlation with the drop in nutrients and some global oceanic mass extinctions. These events are being tested and explored further in further research on selenium, to be released soon.

We can call it "how we all got our body plans"